Jump to content

lozrocks

Members
  • Posts

    245
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lozrocks

  1. On 3/7/2023 at 5:38 PM, viv w said:

    600W is used on Model A Fords. I read an article in their magazine's somewhere that 600W is the measurement to do with its steam rating, but in the same article they said EP140 is much the same oil. I stand to be corrected

    600w oil and ep140 are not even close to being the same thing.

    600w oil has the consistency very similar to honey. It's thickness allows it to adhere to surfaces.

    ep140 is only slightly thicker than engine oil.

    In Australia, 600w oil is very hard to purchase and ep140 works perfectly in my 75.

    • Thanks 1
  2. On 12/2/2022 at 2:18 PM, Frank DuVal said:

    Nope. Many transistor circuits have positive ground! We do have NPN and PNP transistors.... so either grounding system works for solid state.

     

    Many cars had negative ground 6 volt systems waaaay before the transistor was invented.  See Buick and Chevrolet.;)

    NPN and PNP transistors both use negative ground. (or they can both use positive ground) Either ground will work for solid state systems. But once the standard was introduced and accepted by all manufacturers the positive ground circuits were phased out. Some early cars did use negative ground, nobody disputes that, but there are no later vehicles using positive ground.

    The main reason the automotive industry moved to negative ground was to comply with the standard.

  3. Yes there is a logical reason why cars switched to negative ground.

    And it's all to do with setting a standard by which all manufacturers could follow. It was driven by the Japanese starting in the late 1940s to early 1950s and the development of the huge electronics industry in Japan. And in turn the development of semiconductors. A standard was introduced where all electronic devices would use a negative ground. TV and radio manufacturers accepted the standard early. By the mid 1950s the automotive industry was dragged into using the standard which would allow more electronic creature comforts (like hifi radio) to be fitted to cars.

    It really doesn't have anything to do with current flow or sacrificial anodes.

    As a side note: electrons flow from negative to positive, but conventional current flows from positive to negative.

    • Like 2
  4. On 10/22/2022 at 11:36 PM, leomara said:

    Hey lozrocks, I may be mistaken but the bracket on the steering column which holds the ignition switch is the same for your 1929 as for my 1928, correct?  If so the hole for the ignition switch on mine is 1 inch wide and 1 inch deep.  This switch which you used must have required some "work" to make it fit?

    The switch is 19mm in diameter. The hex nut screws off, leaving about 30mm of shaft to go thru the bracket.

  5. I'd have to disagree with the original comment. Clyde Barrow preferred any car that he could steal easily, and I think most gangsters of the day did the same. Yes he died in a 34 Ford and had previously almost been apprehended whilst driving a 32 Ford. But his career started many years before that and Model Ts and Model As weren't known for their speed. 

    Like many gangsters of the era their list of cars isn't known. Al Capone is only known to have bought one Cadillac which occurred in 1928 and it was then armoured. I don't know of any list of his previous vehicles.

    During Dillinger's best known interactions with police he was driving a 33 Ford and then later a 34 Essex, so I doubt he really had a preference for a particular make.

    • Like 2
  6. On 8/11/2022 at 11:48 PM, leomara said:

    lozrocks, what about Champion 561 (W16Y) for Model 72?

    I'm not too up to speed on temperature ranges on spark plugs.

    I think the Champion 20 is also known as a W20 with the 20 being the required temperature. A W16Y may be too hot for the Chrysler engine. (Or is 16 a colder temperature?) Just because it will physically fit doesn't mean that it's the right one.

     

    • Like 1
  7. Chrysler 75 Spark Plugs (should be the same as your 72)

    Thread  7/8” - 18

    Reach 5/8”

    Hex Size 15/16”

    Plug Gap .025

    KLG        AL20

    KLG        A10

    Lodge    ST

    AC          76

    Bosch    Z45T4

    Champion           C4

    Champion           20

    But unless you are wanting originality, I would recommend buying some adapters to change to modern 14mm plugs. 

    • Thanks 1
  8. Vacuum wipers were standard equipment on all Chryslers in 1928 and 1929. It wasn't until 1932 that Chrysler installed a second wiper for the passenger although some export models were equipped with dual wipers prior to then. The first electric wipers weren't installed until after WW2.  The model 72 and 75 closed vehicles had the wiper motor sitting outside the car at the top of the windshield, protected by the visor. The roadsters and tourers had the wiper motor inside the car.

    The vacuum wiper is a very poor system and was typically replaced by an electric motor aftermarket.

    The original wiper motor was made by Trico and the same motor is used on Chrysler vehicles from 1928 to 1931.

    The vacuum is supplied direct from the manifold and is not part of the vacuum tank used for fuel delivery.

    The bracket for the motor is a simple boomerang shape and can be seen in Ben's photos above.

    Trico wiper.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  9. 1 hour ago, Vintageben said:

    Thanks for the info yeah I was thinking that maybe the case. What threw me is that the front seat folds flat like what’s on some Aussie bodies but maybe it was changed here as most of the pics of the American bodies show different. 

    I'm not sure of the origin of the fold down seat. Alan Waters in Taree also has a fold down seat in his 75, but mine is fixed.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...