bob joynt

The CCCA observes both the automotive industry's practice and that of the hobby in general of dating cars, rebodied or not, from the date of construction of the underlying chassis. Today. the chassis is considered in most cases to be the key determinant of whether or not a given vehicle is recognized as a Full Classic. The body basically is an attachment to the chassis and can either enhance or detract from the overall appeal of the car. When the Classics were originally manufactured, the builders identified each vehicle with a Serial Number which in most cases was the frame or engine number. To my knowledge, a body number was never so used. In addition, many Classic manufacturers, both domestic and overseas, did not build bodies but contracted for them from outside coachbuilders i.e. Duesenberg, Rolls Royce, Locomobile, Bentley, Isotta, Hispano etc. In many cases, currently existing Classics are carrying their 2nd or 3rd body, all which were mounted within the Classic era. It was also customary for dealers to transfer bodies around to different chassis' depending upon the market demands. Clearly, the only thing of consistency in all of this for identification purposes is the underlying chassis and when it was built.

Scott- The Locomobile 38 is simply a slightly smaller model than the 48. The following are stats for the 48 and 38: Bore & Stroke-48-4 1/2 x 5 1/2, 38- 4 1/4 x 5; Wheelbase-48-142", 38-139"; Oil capacity-48-6 3/4,38-6 1/4; Water Capacity-48-7 3/4. 38- 7 1/2. The 48 cost approximately 18% more than the 38.

Winnie-I too am interested in the possible purchase of this particular car and would appreciate you're contacting me at "airflowbob@yahoo.com" or telephone #630-879-8884. Will be at a concours in Ohio this weekend, returning Monday PM. I look forward to discussing this car with you. Bob

Michigan has raised the Annual Meeting bar to a new level. A great time was had by all.