29 Chandler

I think I have dialed in the timing. Just by following these steps: Bring #1 to TDC remove Magneto from car holding the position of the coupler back off the set screw holding the coupler to the shaft of the magneto and free up the coupler put the magneto back in the car and re-attach the coupler to the drive shaft from the water pump line up the marks on the magneto so the rotor is ready to fire on #1 Tighten set screw and check marks again pull magneto out again to re-tighten nut on magneto shaft put back in car and check marks again re-attach everything After starting the car up it immediately sounded much happier. I then warmed it up and attached my timing light and made some new marks where full advance and full retard are on the back side of the timing cover. There is now a real difference in how the engine runs and sounds between full advance and full retard. Since I have owned the car I could hardly notice a difference in adjusting the spark. Too late and too much work unfortunately to take it for a test drive today. If its still running poorly I doubt it's due to timing now. Here's a picture of the timing marks on the mag. I now have the two white marks lined up with TDC. The black mark notes full retard.

Cadillac introduced the starter in 1912. Others were soon to follow including the Westinghouse starter on our 1914 car.

Well the morning started out cool and optimistic. I was really hoping a freshly charged battery would be the answer. No luck. With my wife hand cranking the engine we quickly confirmed #1 was getting a nice healthy spark, but based on the way the engine sounded the spark was coming at the wrong time. Time to take the magneto out and look at it on the workbench. In better light and with more access I quickly found another white mark where the rotor lines up to fire on #1, and another mark showing full retard. All this made sense and was what I was hoping to see. Now with the rotor lined up with #1 the coupling for the water pump is nearly 90 degrees off! This is the part that I can not explain. Just pulling the water pump out should not change the alignment of the magneto. To this point I have not had the Magento out of the car and never dared to fiddle with its adjustment. The only thing I could do now was to pull the coupler off the mag and rotate it to mesh with the water pump. Normally the coupler would be keyed to the tapered shaft of the magneto. On mine the key was removed and a set screw was installed. I would have expected to see witness marks on the shaft where the set screw skidded across the shaft, but found just one small detent where the set screw had resided for years. In any case I followed the instructions Mark posted above and got the timing in the proper neighborhood. Put it all back together and was able to start the engine. It ran a short time and then died. My timing was still too far out. Back out came the magneto and a little more advance dialed in. Now the engine jumps to life and ran much better. For the first time in my ownership the advance/retard lever on the steering wheel actually does something. Finally I must be in the proper range. So we took the car out to see how it ran. It has all the signs of too much advance now. Runs too hot and has very little power. By now the temperature here in Southern California is hot and I'm hot. Car is back in the garage cooling off. I'll hook up my timing light and make a mark to show where I am and then pull the mag out again and retard it a bit. I am really hoping when this is all done the car will surprise me and run better than it ever has for us. With no other similar cars to compare against its a little hard to know when I have reached maximum performance. I know one thing just sitting behind the wheel its easy to tell when the car is happy and when it's not. More to come...

Mark thank you for sharing this. It is a much clearer explanation than what I found in Dykes though in the end ultimately the same one info. Am going to give the battery a chance to recharge on the trickle charger and the gas in the updraft carb to a chance to clear overnight before I give it another shot. Based on all your feedback so far I may have the magneto aligned correctly but am now faced with a flooded engine after all the failed attempts to align the mag today.

I’ll enlist my wife’s help tomorrow to confirm we are actually getting a spark at #1 when I think we are. I have never tried my timing light on this car. Maybe I will do that after I get it running.

No, the gears and timing chain did not move.

Full retard is a small adjustment on my mag and not enough to align the mag to the water pump. I can only go 180 degrees in either direction and right now it is lined up just before #1

I used the position of the brush on the mag to determine that. It is now lined up to provide spark for #1 when the cylinder is on the compression stroke

I am officially stumped. A few weeks ago I took out the water pump to have it rebuilt, new impeller and threaded rod for the shaft to rotate in. The water pump drives the Bosch DU6 magneto. I failed to keep the magneto in proper alignment with the pump and now I have to get it back in line. The water pump is driven off a timing chain in the front of the engine. There is a shaft going through the water pump that drives the mag. I have done the following to try and get the mag hooked up to the water pump shaft. BTW there is no adjustable coupling between the two, you can only install it 180' in either direction. To find TDC for the #1 cylinder I did the following: Since this is an L head engine and has a primer cup above each cylinder I opened each cup so the engine could be turned easily by the hand crank. Next I put a balloon (actually a severed middle finger from a glove) over the #1 primer cup so I could find when it was on the compression stroke. As I cranked the engine through its revolutions I could see when the balloon filled with air. This lined up nicely with a timing mark on the fan pulley that the previous owner put there. I then tuned the armature of the mag until the brush was lined up with the #1 terminal. I re-secured the water pump shaft to the mag to keep it all aligned. I then hand cranked the engine three more times, noting when the #1 cylinder was at TDC, the mark on the pulley was straight up, and the brush on the mag was at #1 terminal. At this point I closed all of the primer cups and secured the ignition wires back to the mag. and began my normal starting procedure. Not starting. I am getting spark, but it does not sound like it is happening at the right time. This was a smooth running engine before I took the water pump out. Did I follow the correct procedure to find TDC and set the mag? Did I miss something? Unfortunately there is no shop manual for this car and I am the only one with a running example. I used a 1917 Dykes manual as my guide to understand the Mag. Here's a picture of the engine for a reference:

You might be the first to run into this issue. Thus far I have not heard of any of these cars being restored yet. Post lots of pictures and hopefully we can get some answers.

Frank I am not aware of anyone making replacemnet parts for the Big 6. There were some replacement oil pumps made for the Standard 6 a while back, but they are different engines I think. The Pulley should be rather straight forward to get made by a machinist. The carb is probably a Carter BB-1, one of the more common carbs used as a replacement. My 1914 Chandler has been running one for years. Did you buy the car recently? One of the two Chandlers recently in the Buy/Sell section?

True about the pot metal parts and common of cars of this vintage. Parts can be hard to find. Chandler made many of their own parts including engines. can you post any pictures? this book is required reading if you are interested in these cars.

Terry you have a very desirable Chandler car. In my biased opinion one of the most desirable models that Chandler built from 1913-1929. Obviously the actual value will be between you and the buyer. I only know of a few that have survived so rarity is one your side for those that are looking for a Royal Dispatch. Good luck with the sale.

The first Chandler I drove in was very similar to this one. Amazing car. In my very biased opinion they are the best cars Chandler made in the 1920's.

Yes the photos you have provided are a great help. Chandler cars are rare to begin with and low mileage cars even rarer. Keep in mind rarity on a car like this can have both a positive and negative effect on value. Being a rare model, Big Six, and the steel body, make it desirable as a collector car. But being so few around also makes it difficult to collect parts for to maintain. Trust me I am not trying to be little the car. I am speaking from experience, aside from our all original 1929 Model 65 Standard Six we also have the oldest running Chandler. 1914 Chandler model 15 still with less than 17,000 miles on it. I hope you all are able to be realistic on the perceived value on this car. Given that there are so few similar cars coming up with a "market price" will be difficult. Maybe in $10-15k range? Maybe more, only you and the next buyer will know for sure. Good luck! Let me know if you have any more questions. BTW the rubber mat in front and carpet in back was standard issue from the factory.

Darel you have a 1927 Model 35 "Big Six" with an all steel body. For the sake of the next owner, who I hope will preserve this car and all of its original details as much as possible, do not do anything more to it. On the down side there is a whole lot of pot metal to deal with, including the oil pump that is now probably broken. On the up side the you have the very rare Budd all steel body which means there is no wood to deal with. The wood finish you see on the interior is painted metal. Good luck with the sale and best wishes to the new owner. I hope that you will share with us more details about this car so we can better document the original details from the factory.

The chains on my car are original and loose. No issues so far but it is on my todo list.

Leak no more! New water manifold installed and tested.

Eric I know a guy! Another option would be to take my set and have them cast in bronze. BTW does that engine also have three silent chains on the front like my 1914 does? If so did you have to replace them?

Update So last week I brought the part of to my friend who said clean it up and pull out the copper liner, I'll weld it up for you. Well after getting the part sandblasted I dropped it off at his house for the week. He's a master at welding and fabrication so I knew it was in good hands. Plan A was to weld it up and reinforce the flange and get it nickeled again. The back half of the manifold worked out, but the front half where there were some prior repairs not so much. Plan B, remake the whole part out of 12ga rolled steel stock that he just happened to have in the garage. It turned out wonderful! I have a tour next weekend so the plan is to rattle can it now and then mount it on the block for the tour. Then I can take more time and clean up and get it nickeled.

Here’s a few photos of the cowl lights on my 1929 Chandler Note these are Nickel plated a little bit different from those for sale

Is there a diagram for a 1914 Chandler?

Parts Ancient really enjoying the blog on your Simplex. Thanks for taking the time to post and documnet the process.

Thank you guys for the feedback. I figured a replacement was in order after 100 plus years. I'll look into the bronze casting as the long term solution. Always appreciate the support this communities offers!

For context this is how it looked before it started to leak.