Jump to content

JamesR

Members
  • Posts

    1,947
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JamesR

  1. Thanks for posting, 58L-Y8. Love the car.

     

    I'm with GHE on red - but this Thunderbird is stylish enough to make that color work. Besides, it seems to have so many other things going for it: No rust, California origins, rebuilt engine and tranny, good interior, good price.

     

    It pains me to sell my, '65 Landau project, but I need the space. Had I spent more on a non-project car like this '62, I'd probably never let it go.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. The bonded title process mentioned above is the only realistic way I know of to get a non-titled car titled, at least where I'm at. There is some risk involved, though, and as I recall there's a fair bit of time that has to elapse before legitimate ownership is certified. Less stringent states might have a wider range of options.

     

    Bonded tiles should be viewed as a viable option only if you've already purchased the vehicle, i.e., as a last resort.  Don't knowingly buy an untitled car thinking you'll get a title through the bonding process. If you've already bought the car, this can be a learning lesson for you going forward.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  3. Thanks for posting. That was back when car makers had a lot of influence on popular culture. Still, I always laugh when '60's era companies tried to "relate" to young people through TV ads or through video presentations. Their choices of music were always several years behind the times, and back in the fad crazy 1960's, that was like an eternity (to young people.)

    • Like 2
  4. 11 hours ago, 8E45E said:

    First off, my dad was NOT a 'car guy'. 

     

    Same here, Craig. My Dad thought cars and young people didn't mix. In his opinion, getting a car in high school was only slightly better than becoming a drug addict. I.e. if you got a car when you were 16, you'd never go to college (and maybe not even graduate from high school.) But if you DIDN'T get a car in high school, your chances of becoming president of the United States were pretty good.

     

    OK, that wasn't his actual opinion, but not far off. 😄

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  5. On 2/29/2024 at 7:13 AM, John_S_in_Penna said:

    I really like the way the taillights are faired into

    the upper trunk surface.  That's unusual and

    good looking, too.

    I also like the look of the slender C pillar, which looks elegant from the inside of the car. I'm more used to seeing that type of C pillar on fancy two door hardtops of that era, like Ford Starliners and GM "bubbletops." I agree that once the paint issues are addressed, this Pontiac could be an affordable way to get into a dramatic looking car with space-age styling. (Love the stars on the side trim!)

    image.png.a6cc6e4361858039af32ded8e27e1220.png

    • Like 3
  6. I like it because you don't see many business coupes for that year and make. They have a really good look to them.

     

    One possibility is to keep it as is for driving around on gravel roads that you'd never expose your shiny/nicely painted old cars to. I love driving old cars in the country but gravel roads keep me from exploring some places that I'm sure would be very cool.

  7. 3 hours ago, rocketraider said:

    Is that a dent in the tailpanel on passenger side of the gas cap, or a reflection?

     

    Looks like a dent to me, Rocket.

     

    I love the unloved four door Mercury's and compact cars (of all makes) from the early sixties, but a large part of the appeal for me is the lower cost of getting into one. If this car is worth $6700, then I'd extrapolate that my V-8 powered '61 Monterey is worth something like $10k - $11k...and I really don't think my car is worth that kind of money.  Maybe I'm wrong about this Comet, though. We'll see what it brings and how fast it brings it.

    • Like 1
  8. Thanks Lew. Here's an article with a little bit more info on the 368, which was apparently borrowed from the Lincoln (though still a "Y-block.") I think the Lincoln Y-block had a better reputation than the Ford version, though many of the Ford Y-blocks provided good reliability and power for FoMoCo vehicles over the years.

     

    Apparently, the new generation redesign of the Mercury in '57 was intended to distance the car more from the Ford line (i.e. move it more upscale) so a Lincoln engine was offered, but it wasn't until '58 that the MEL engine was introduced, so in '57 they used the Lincoln Y-block. As far as I can determine, that was the only year that type of engine was used in a Mercury. That help explains why I wasn't familiar with that option.

     

    Below the Hood: 1957 Lincoln Premiere's 368 V-8 was a smooth, spirited powerhouse with ample torque | Hemmings

  9. I'm not sure, but I don't think Wyoming was a common source for westbound Depression era migrants, at least for "dust bowl" reasons. I suppose there were many other reasons to move during those hard times, though. God Bless those amazing people. A few of them are still with us. Thanks for the pics.

  10. My brother and I were just talking about going to Chickasha (and surrounding areas) this spring to see family and explore family history. It would be nice if our trip could coincide with this event. I don't do pre-war, but if it's open to the public, it would be a great sight seeing opportunity for an afternoon.  Thanks for letting us know, Trulyvintage.

  11. Karla, welcome to the forum and congratulations on your new old car! Here's some advice: This will depend (as most licensing and registration issues do) on the state where you live, but be careful if or when buying vintage plates online. Five years ago I purchased a pair of "old" license plates online (eBay I think.) They were for my state, matched the year of my car ('65) and looked to be in good shape. When I took them down to the DMV, however, the guy got out his big magnifying glass and started giving my plates the once over. He then informed me my plates were newer reissues and that they couldn't be used for licensing my old car! He said the embossing font was ever so slightly different from the original. It didn't look that different to me, but his decision was final. I think the plates 40 or 50 dollars, so I was out that money. A warning sign is if the plates look in a little too good condition to have been on a car before.

     

    You were very correct not to guilt trip the guy over the old  plate. No sense in creating a bad feeling with a person who gave you a car. I felt bad at first about not being able to get original plates for my '65 Ford, but I got over it quickly. Please keep us updated on the progress of your cool VW (work done or trips taken.)

    • Thanks 1
  12. About 15 years ago I saw a nice looking recently restored two door version in a used car showroom for not much more than the original asking price of this car. I think it was $8900. But I admit 15 years is a long time.

    As for the current price, it makes me more encouraged about asking/getting $6500+ for my good running driving '65 T-Bird. I'll be interested to see how quickly this Chevy sells at this price

×
×
  • Create New...