Jump to content

Jack Worstell

Members
  • Posts

    245
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jack Worstell

  1. Jenz38 ( I believe he is in Germany ) reported that he put a 263 from a Dynaflow car in his 1938 Buick....but he had to fabricate a new flywheel. Being in Germany he had limited choice and couldn't find a 263 from a manual transmission car Somewhere he published drawings/dimensions of the flywheel he fabricated Jack Worstell
  2. Jim Now that Lloyd is gone....who does overdrive conversions ? Jack Worstell
  3. JamesR......I'm surprised you got the title on the 55 Chysler. The deceased had an estate and whoever handled the estate normally would be required to do a title release. Or the beneficary to whom the car was assigned to thru the the terms of the estate settlement At any rate...glad for you that it all worked out Jack Worstell
  4. I have lost my copy of Buick Bulletin 6 D-912 dated 2-28-38 esp pp 6,7, and 8 This bulletin contains info on the 1937 Buick Centerline radio and this is my prime interest in this bulletin. PP 6, 7 and 8 show .....component layout, top and bottom views and . ... component listing with brief specs I have the Buick manual for this radio ( I bought a copy from the BCA ) but the manual does not include this info the bulletin has Can anyone help ? Jack Worstell jlwmaster@aol.com
  5. Is this car located on Jerry West Blvd ?? Jack Worstell
  6. I've always been a bit confused on the subject of when Buick went to insert bearings on the mains and on the rods I'm pretty sure that the rods went from babbit to modern precision insert sometime in 1949 ( so 1949s had babbit and 1950s had insert rod bearings ???) But the mains...I think this did in fact happen in the late 1930s....but these inserts were not the modern precision type...ie they still used shims. And in 1949 the change was further made to modern precision inserts...no shims needed. Do I have this right ??
  7. the simplest answer is the battery posts. Check the connection of the heavy "hot" cable on the solenoid terminal. Also check the heavy copper strap connections from the other solenoid terminal to the starter case. All of the starter current...which is a lot of amps...has to go thru the solenoid so these connections really have to be good Is the battery voltage at 12V or so ? I suggest these in the vein of "easy things first" I suppose you still are using the original battery cables ( for 6V service )...these are plenty heavy enough for 12V use Jack Worstell
  8. Thanks everyone for the advice. Jack Worstell
  9. So ISO 32 is about 15W and this would be good to use in the shocks in a 1937 Special ? ( in other words...15W motorccyle fork oil would be about right ?) Jack Worstell
  10. I've read advice that for lever/knee action shocks ( eg 1937 Special ) that motorcycle fork oil is good to use And I plan on following this advice.....but what weight ? 10W ? or 20W? or 30W? or what? Jack Worstell
  11. Is your generator the three brush type ( uses a two element regulator) or the two brush type ( uses a three element regulator ) Jack Worstell
  12. Dave....I have heard that you can take the field wire off of the regulator and ( with the motor doing about 1000RPM) touch the end of this field wire briefly to ground. If then the ammeter shows charge....then the trouble is in the regulator. And if no charge... then the trouble is in the generator This doesn't fix the problem but it does narrow the search I have never done this test myself...but I'm fairly sure it should work Jack Worstell
  13. There are two methods for polarization. One for internally grounded generator field coils and one for externally grounded generator field coils. Your unit has externally grounded field coils. So......which polarization method did you use ?? Jack Worstell
  14. Is everyone using the same notions of "short" and "open" ?? To me an open is a break in a wire........so that an ohm meter reading would go to infinity. And a short is where a wire touches another conductor such that there is an alternate/inadvertent/undesirable path for current flow Ohms would depend on between which points in the circuit are being measured but in general ohms would not go to infinity. Of course there could be an open in a wire circuit such that one ....or both........ ends of the wire could end up touching an alternate/inadvertent/undesirable conductor providing another path for current flow. When I hear "open" I think of infinity ohms. But when I hear "short" I don't think of infinity ohms. My point is this.....using the terms open and short requires a common understanding of what these terms mean So far as testing coils...I agree with Bloo.....the only complete test a coil is to make it produce a spark. Even if the ohms in the primary and secondary circuits check out OK.....the internal insulation ( trying to control thousands of volts) might not hold up under load. And if the coil also includes a condenser...... most multimeters cannot be used to test condensers.......and in my experience condensers can measure OK but still be unreliable under load When I want to check out a coil...I check the primary and secondary windings for correct ohms. And then if this checks out OK I still try to install the coil in a car and see if it will produce a fat spark. My two cent's worth Jack Worstell
  15. So Marvel Mystery Oil is just a mixture of hydrocarban molecules ??? If so....there can't be anything very special about it..... Jack Worstell
  16. What is Stoddard Solvent ? A solvent based on a mix of hydroarbons of some sort ? Jack Worstell
  17. To follow up on Bob Engle's comment If you have the retaining pin ( and not the retaining set screw ) and if you try to remove it by drilling it out... be careful....if you drill in too far you'll run into the key cylinder and ruin it ( ....I made that mistake ) Jack Worstell
  18. Matt thanks for the info. After reading your reply...I remembered the "new" way to get to these old articles.....I had forgotten. Jack
  19. I used to be able to access the old Torque Tube ( ie 1982 to July 2005 ) articles on the internet . I can't anymore. I can still get to the index for these articles ( compiled by Frank Freda ) But when I click on a link to get to the actual issue of the Torque Tube ...all I get is an image of the first page ?? I can't get past this to see individual articles There is a ton of useful info in these old articles. I hope this info has not been lost. Maybe I'm just doing something wrong ? If anyone can still get to these articles.... ....can you tell me....... step by step ........what to do ? Jack Worstell jlwmaster@aol.com
  20. Ben....do you know how I can reach Evan ? Jack
  21. Morgan Can you confirm that the bell housing from a 1937 Special will bolt up to a 263 block ( from either a Dynaflow car or from a manual transmission car) ? Jack
  22. Has anyone put a 1950s 263 engine in a 1937 Special ? Jack Worstell jlwmaster@aol.com
×
×
  • Create New...