Jump to content

Adambravo

Members
  • Posts

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Adambravo

  • Birthday 02/10/1964

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Adambravo's Achievements

1,000+ Points

1,000+ Points (3/7)

  • Dedicated
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

15

Reputation

  1. I did, but the first link focused on 1965s, and most of the second link focused on 1964/65…
  2. Thanks for all the input so far. I should note that I am currently running 205/75 R15s; I'm assuming I need to stick to 205s unless I change the wheels (which I am not)... Any additional input on whitewall width? My car is largely original (one repaint, about 30 years ago, original interior except for the wood trim) so I want something that's period-appropriate for a '63.
  3. Hey, all! Based on my searching, it looks like the newest discussion on this topic is about eight years old, so I thought I would raise it again to see if there is any newer info. I’m at the 10 year mark to replace the tires on my 1963, and looking for recommendations on brands. I currently have a three-quarter inch whitewall, but it appears, based on my reading, that a 1 inch or 1.3 inch might be more correct. Any other thoughts are welcome—and thanks in advance…
  4. The grille appears to be the wrong shape (and it’s got two headlamps).
  5. Driven by my grandfather…
  6. Thanks for everyone's comments so far. Yes, it's definitely the taillamps--I tightened up the bolts on both sides (a friend had originally suggested to only tighten them a bit to avoid overtorqueing) and sprayed water directly at the taillamps. I am inclined to think it was the bezels rather than the lenses. When I got the new bezel gaskets I thought they seemed pretty thick--I can't imagine doubling them up. I will probably try using the Ultraseal on the existing new gaskets to start before I drop another $150 on new rubber on top of the $80+ I already spent. I also have this--not sure if it's better, worse, or complementary to the Ultraseal.
  7. I don't know what kind of nasty karma hit me, but I discovered a damp trunk in my 1963 Riviera a couple of weeks ago--and despite getting new gaskets for both the taillamp lenses and taillamp housings, they still leak. After letting everything dry out and pulling the liner, I pointed the hose at them and got water on both sides. The slightly good news is that the trunk seal appears fine. But now what?
  8. So, after discovering a damp trunk a few weeks ago, I think I've solved the leak issue but I do need a new trunk liner. I've searched the boards here but don't see any posts newer than late 2021 (including a reference to a place called Clark's, which I can't find), so I'm reaching out for the latest suggestions and recommendations. I've seen offerings at ProFit (https://www.bopparts.com/1963-buick-riviera-trunk-mat-tweed-gray-5-pieces.html) and BOP Parts (https://www.bopparts.com/1963-buick-riviera-trunk-mat-tweed-gray-5-pieces.html); any feedback or additional places to look? I've attached a photo of what I currently have back there... Thanks in advance,
  9. Yes, just 1. I’ll have to drill the old bit out somehow…
  10. Hey, all! I am trying to find a replacement bolt for the tail lamp on my 1963 Riviera. One of them has broken off and I’m not sure exactly how to look for this kind of part. Any suggestions? Do I need to find a specialty distributor, or is this sort of thing I can find at a hardware store? Thanks in advance!
  11. Thanks for everyone’s answers so far. As you can see in the photo, I appear to have a third-party carpet mat that is not glued down on top of what looks like the original factory fabric. I’m thinking I could simply ditch the carpeting, given how dirty it is, or find a replacement for this one
  12. The carpet in my trunk is fairly intact, but a little shabby looking. Can I simply throw it in the washing machine, or is there a better way to do this?
  13. Jul/Aug (with a sweet black ‘64 on the cover)…
  14. Has anyone else had a chance to read the article in the latest review which quotes from the Society Of Automotive Engineers technical paper on the original ‘63 Riviera? There were a couple of weird inconsistencies which caught my eye… 1. There was a discussion upfront that indicated GM market research identified an opportunity for Buick to come to market with a luxury sport vehicle. However, this seems to contradict all of the historical information which indicates Riviera was originally designed for Cadillac, who turned it down, and then it was offered to Buick, Olds, and Pontiac—and Buick had the best pitch. 2. There was a considerable amount of time spent discussing the design of the instrument panel, apparently neglecting to mention it was virtually identical to that offered in all the other full-size Buicks, with the exception of adding a center console. Otherwise, there was some interesting information in there, including the design of the doors with frameless glass, and the climate control hardware. Good to know a little more about the history of my car…
×
×
  • Create New...