Jump to content

J3Studio

Members
  • Posts

    1,108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by J3Studio

  1. I ordered a few of the Mercedes-Benz books @Steve_Mack_CT suggested. With the mail being what it is, they have been slow to arrive. John Olson's The SL Experience came today, and I'm quite impressed. Olson really does cover the entire experience, divvying the 360-page book up into the actual cars (from 1954 to 2002), "Purchases and Ownership," "SLs Are For Driving," and "Art, Books and People."

     

    Thanks again, Steve!

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, RivNut said:

    I wouldn't be concerned about numbers matching either.  Going for a rebuild leaves you with what you had.  IF it were me, and that's a big if, I would consider a rebuilt Oldsmobile 350 from a era that had some horsepower. I've owned 5 of these; 84, and 85 coupes,  84 convertible, and two 83 XX Anniversary cars.  Loved every one of them but hated the doggie performance.  As a friend of mine who calls his Eldorado with the same engine his "Flat lander town car."  Meaning it doesn't have the oomph to cruise easily at modern highway speeds - remember the speedometer has 55 in big numbers; wasn't designed to cruise at 70 - 75 all day long. And it's not a car that takes to the hills easily either.  Under powered and long in the tooth. 2.79 axle ratio, overdrive transmission, and a lockup torque converter don't make for a smooth drive through rolling hills. Early smog motor and carburetor don't help much either.  If possible find a 79 Riviera to drive that is powered by a 350 engine and you'll know what a difference there is. Might be worthy of consideration.  If you really want to be bold, look for the 403 (6.6 liter) Oldsmobile engine that was used in the Pontiac Firebird Trans Am - think Smokey and the Bandit.  (6.6 Trans Ams with an automatic transmission used the 403 Oldsmobile; the same Trans Am with  4 speed used the 400 Pontiac engine.)

     

    Thanks for the reality check from someone who was there—I often forget that my particular eighties car is way to the right of the contemporary performance bell curve. The funny thing is that by 1982 the Riviera was in much better powertrain shape than the Eldorado, who had to go with the 135 bhp HT-4100.

    It's interesting to think about swapping in the 1979/1980 350 ci engine.

    • Like 1
  3. 5 hours ago, dship said:

    I agree. I don't believe it is important for the 6th generation Rivieras to be numbers matching....don't even know if there are any numbers to be matched.

     

    I find it hard to believe that GM varied significantly across its product lines in this portion of the production process within the same era, so there are probably numbers to match. Their existence does not mean that they can be easily found or deciphered—or that many care to. Perhaps when @JCK55buick pulls the original engine, he can examine it for number stampings—if he is so inclined.

  4. 6 hours ago, John2012 said:

    Numbers matching is important for a limited number of cars.  A 1983 Riviera is not one of them.  If it is more financially feasible to get a good used 307 as opposed to a rebuild of the original I would go that route.  

     

    I concur, especially since the numbers-matching crowd (and I know many of them) will already shy away because of the 106,000 miles. Get a good used 307 and drive that Riviera!

  5. 5 hours ago, dship said:

    Oh and by the way, I been looking for a used '94 Riviera for the longest time but can't seem to find one any place!!

     

    :)

     

    To be serious, does anybody know if there were ever plans for a 1994 Riviera, but they were deferred? A GM example that comes easily to mind is the Corvette. There was supposed to be a 1983 Corvette, but it ended up being deferred to an early 1984, mostly because of quality reasons. Only one of the 43 pilot-line 1983s remains—it's at the National Corvette Museum.

  6. 1 hour ago, edinmass said:

    We have both spindles off the car. We knew the passenger side had problems. When we got the drivers side apart it too was not where it needed to be. New inner and outer wheel bearings have been sourced. The new bushings have been ordered and arrive tomorrow. Not too bad ordering new off the shelf front end parts for a 104 year old car.

     

    Agreed. I think this has been one of the most amazing things in this thread.

  7. I'm interested in opinions. How many generations do you think the Riviera had?

     

    I can think of three options:

     

    1) Seven generations

     

        1963-1965

        1966-1970

        1971-1976

        1977-1978

        1979-1985

        1986-1993

        1995-1999

     

    2) Eight generations:

     

        1963-1965

        1966-1970

        1971-1973

        1974-1976

        1977-1978

        1979-1985

        1986-1993

        1995-1999

     

    3) Nine generations:

     

        1963-1965

        1966-1970

        1971-1973

        1974-1976

        1977-1978

        1979-1985

        1986-1988

        1989-1993

        1995-1999

     

    Thoughts?

  8. On 11/24/2020 at 10:46 AM, 1965rivgs said:

    I was aware of the bolt down reproductions but didn't know about the detractor type version, thanks again.

    The repro covers versus original have different company names/logos and the molded model numbers are different.

     

    Far from just a Riviera issue—why can't folks show the attention to detail to make good reproductions? Are we the few who care?

×
×
  • Create New...