26716 Members
90 Forums
119222 Topics
533345 Posts
Max Online: 479 @ 03/26/08 04:18 PM
|
|
|
Lost your password? Can't remember your username? Having registration problems? Answers to many of these problems can be
FOUND HERE!
|
|
|
#520022 - 06/29/08 12:01 AM
1953 Buick trans problem help!!!
|
Member
Registered: 01/07/06
Posts: 31
|
Had a friend install a 1953 straight 8 into my 52 super wagon. The trans is a 52 dynaflow. Cannot get the trans and engine to hook up. What am I doing wrong? Will this combination not work? Can I only use a 53 dynaflow trans. Any ideas or suggestions? Was thinking of just getting an adaptor plate (don't know where) and hooking up a 350 chevy trans. Appreciate anyone's expertise in this matter.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#520054 - 06/29/08 08:27 AM
Re: 1953 Buick trans problem help!!!
[Re: maxwell07]
|
Member
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 2117
Loc: Swartz Creek MI. U.S.A .
|
The 53 throught 56 had the same bell housing. From 57 to 66 they were larger
_________________________
37 46 modified with 455 & all the toys 40 56C original restored (driven over 100,000 miles by me) 69 Sport Wagon (BDE travelling car) 72 GS 455 ( used to harass Mustangs & Camaros) 92 Roadmaster Wagon 96 Roadmaster wagon 04 Rendezevous (Mama's ride)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#520081 - 06/29/08 11:13 AM
Re: 1953 Buick trans problem help!!!
[Re: The Old Guy]
|
Member
Registered: 01/07/06
Posts: 31
|
Thanks for the response. So I guess I need a 53-56 trans? Is the trans the same for the straight 8 special as the v-8 or are they also different?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#520221 - 06/30/08 12:59 AM
Re: 1953 Buick trans problem help!!!
[Re: maxwell07]
|
Member
Registered: 01/19/06
Posts: 32
Loc: Tukwila, WA
|
The '53-'56 Nailheads had the same bolt pattern for the trans and the '57-'66 Nailheads were the same. The '53 263 straight 8 from a Special should have the same bell housing pattern as the 263 in your '52 Super. The crankshaft ends were different for the Dynaflow and manual transmission cars. So did the '53 engine come from a car with a manual trans? The crankshafts for the 263 interchange will for '50-'53 if needed.
_________________________
Sean Smith BCA# 42746
1957 Special 4-door Riviera (hardtop) model 43
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#521318 - 07/05/08 09:04 AM
Re: 1953 Buick trans problem help!!!
[Re: sean1997]
|
Member
Registered: 01/07/06
Posts: 31
|
I believe the 53 engine was hooked to a dynaflow. That's where the confusion is. Thought for sure it would bolt right up. My buddy said there was a gap and he could not marry the engine and trans together with the torque converter. He is familiar enough with engines, to understand the pilot bearing situation. It was a few years ago, so I need to give him a call and see exactly what the problem was. I can only guess that I may need a 53 trans., but that just doesn't make sense to me either.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#521329 - 07/05/08 10:04 AM
Re: 1953 Buick trans problem help!!!
[Re: maxwell07]
|
Member
Registered: 11/01/05
Posts: 184
Loc: Michigan
|
I may be off here, and since I wasn't sure I didn't want to chime in. Buick switched to a twin-turbine dynaflow in '53, ad '53 was the last year of the straight eight...I BELIEVE that the earlier Dynaflow will not bolt up with the '53 engine. Go to buicks.net and post in the straught 8 section...if I'm wrong, someone there might know. Good luck!
_________________________
1953 Buick Special Riviera 45R 1965 Buick Skylark 44437 300-4V 1965 Ford Mustang 1965 Chevy Corvair Monza Convertible
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|