home
Become a Member | Photo Gallery | Contact Us
The Antique Automobile Club of America discussion forum is a FREE online community for those interested in exchanging information about ALL antique, classic, and collectible automobiles. AACA membership IS NOT required to register. Explore, read, contribute, and enjoy!
Search

Participating Clubs
Sponsors







SEMA


Go to SEMA Action Network for the most up-to-date legislative info related to our hobby.

Who's Online
62 Registered (1929Chrysler, 1965pony, 24T42, 51dyno, 63viking, 89TC-16V), 117 Guests and 19 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
27189 Members
91 Forums
120789 Topics
541081 Posts

Max Online: 479 @ 03/26/08 04:18 PM
Need Help?
Lost your password? Can't remember your username? Having registration problems? Answers to many of these problems can be FOUND HERE!
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:
#509267 - 05/12/08 10:38 PM Antique or Classic
365 Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/07
Posts: 50
Okay! So I'm relativly a new member and looks like I have missed the memo on how to determine an Antique from a Classic. Do we have some set rules that establish quidelines on the issue. I do hope we don't let our individual state MVD determine or do we???

Top
#509274 - 05/12/08 10:50 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 365]
58Mustang Offline
Member

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 298
Loc: Sunny SoCal
Everyone has their own ideas and every state has theirs. The only guidelines that are generally agreed upon are the ones set up by the CCCA and the AACA. You will argue until you are blue in the face with people who say their Pinto or their Chev Caprice is a classic
_________________________
John Callin
25 Ford Roadster pickup(sold)
47 Whizzer(for sale soon)
48 Whizzer (sold)
48 Cushman(for sale soon)
50 Cushman(sold)
58 Mustang (sold)
98 Boss Hoss M/C 350 CID/385 HP

Top
#509278 - 05/12/08 11:31 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 58Mustang]
Peter Gariepy Administrator Offline
Web Mechanic

Registered: 08/30/02
Posts: 4593
Loc: Tucson, AZ
58Mustang is right.

AACA defines an antique as any car 25 years and older.

CCCA has a great formal list of cars they define as "Classics".

http://www.classiccarclub.org/CarList.htm
_________________________
Peter Gariepy
Web Mechanic
www.aaca.org

CARS: 1961 King Midget, 1903 Curved Dash Olds (Replica)
CLUBS: Life Member, Antique Automobile Club of America (AACA)

Top
#509287 - 05/13/08 02:05 AM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: Peter Gariepy]
1937hd45 Offline
Long Time Member

Registered: 11/01/01
Posts: 5269
365, Welcome to the AACA Forum. To answer your question we should know how old you are, the politicaly correct answer to your question depends on it. I'm 57 and went to my first show in 1961, an Antique was a vehicle built PRE 1916 and a Classic was a high end vehicle that is on the list of CCCA list of accepted vehicles. Today any rusted out piece of crap that is 25 years old can get an "Antique" plate here in Connecticut and generaly speaking a "Classic" has left the dealership and the first payment may or maynot have been paid. The hobby was great up till 1975, then it nosedived.

Top
#509312 - 05/13/08 08:02 AM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 1937hd45]
West Peterson Administrator Offline
Long Time Member

Registered: 04/28/04
Posts: 3105
Loc: Dayton
Come on, Bob. The hobby is still great and you know it.
_________________________
MT2MB

Top
#509323 - 05/13/08 09:04 AM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: West Peterson]
mrpushbutton Offline
Member

Registered: 09/02/05
Posts: 1281
Loc: Detroit, MI - the home of Pack...
"Classic" is a term thrown around by the general public and the media, used to describe anything that is out of production, an '89 Caprice Classic with 22" ghetto rims is described as "classic" To further explain what 58 mustang said, most states determine that any vehicle 25 years old or older to be an antique. I came into the antique car hobby in the 60s as a kid, so I have a hard time seeing a 1980 Monte Carlo as an antique, but by definition it is.
The Classic Car Club of America made a list not long after their forming that clearly states what is a classic car by their recognition, and what they will accept/judge at their meets. The cars the CCCA defines as "Full Classics" (a term they had to invent and trademark due to the inability of any group of people to "own" a word) were very expensive when new, sold to an exclusive clientele and sometimes featured advanced engineering, sometimes very un-advanced engineering, and were built between 1925 and 1948. Most, if not all of the post-war cars on their list ('46-'48) are built on chassis' that were used before the war and sometimes have superficial cosmetic changes to the bodies.
I personally prefer to only refer to cars on the CCCA list as "Classics" and use the other terms that apply to a given vehicle such as:

Gas Buggy
Early automobile
Brass car
antique car
'teens car
twenties car
thirties car
exotic car
forties car
fifties car
fin mobile
22 feet of bad taste
sixties car
compact car
sports car
muscle car
seventies junk
General Lee clone
eighties junk
struggle buggy
hobby horse (jacked up pick-up truck)
beater car
hooptie car
Pimp mobile

this is only a partial list. I am not in the CCCA, don't have any problem at all with their list or goals as a club, I just don't like the word "Classic" thrown around.
_________________________
John

The real pity in America is that the people who really know how to run the country are all tending bar and cutting hair--George Burns

Top
#509335 - 05/13/08 09:48 AM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: mrpushbutton]
Chacheska Offline
Member

Registered: 04/04/01
Posts: 143
Boy, this topic really hits home. Whenever I see the word 'Classic' used on a 1970 or 1980 something car on Craigslist I contact the owner and try to tell them what a real classic is by suggesting they do a Google search under the letters CCCA. 4 out of 5 times I get a reply that tells me to go F myself or to mind my own F'n business. I've been in some interesting and colorful verbal sparring matches with a few of these nitwits. Another thing I've tried to do, and in this case was successful, was to contact the local newspaper and the Swap Sheet and explain to the editors what a classic car was since they never seem to have any real classics (as defined by the CCCA) in their columns labeled 'Classic'. Both editors listened and understood my explanation and both changed their column headings by taking out the word 'Classic' and replacing it with Antique and/or Collector cars. It's a small step but one that may help younger collectors who don't have a clue as to the meaning of the word 'Classic' better understand the category to which their 1985 Monte Carlo or 1974 Chevelle fits in. I agree wholeheartedly that the word 'Classic' is probably the most over used and wrongly used term in the car hobby right next to the term 'frame off' restoration.
_________________________

Top
#509345 - 05/13/08 10:49 AM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: Chacheska]
mrpushbutton Offline
Member

Registered: 09/02/05
Posts: 1281
Loc: Detroit, MI - the home of Pack...
I gave up on the media a long time ago. Every year we in the Detroit area have the Woodward Dream Cruise (AKA the "nightmare crawl"), 40-50,000 "classic" cars in 9 miles, and every news station uses the "C" word.
_________________________
John

The real pity in America is that the people who really know how to run the country are all tending bar and cutting hair--George Burns

Top
#509350 - 05/13/08 11:07 AM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: mrpushbutton]
Clipper47 Offline
Member

Registered: 12/30/05
Posts: 915
Loc: Northwestern Non-tario
Chacheska, You are a real bear for punishment! I gave up long ago trying to educate people about what is a Classic car and what is not. One local club, composed of mostly steet rod owners, calls itself the " Northern Ontario Classic Cruisers" and there is not a bonefide Classic car in the bunch. In Ontario a car must be 30 years old before it qualifies for Historic Vehicle licence plates so I still have 5 more years to go before my winter beater daily driver "CLASSIC" 1983 Volvo 240 is eligible but I can now enter it in the local car shows as an "antique" or "classic", which seems to most people to be interchangeable definitions. :-)
_________________________
Dave Kenney


Top
#509362 - 05/13/08 12:02 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: Clipper47]
oldcarfudd Offline
Member

Registered: 10/29/05
Posts: 67
I refuse to acknowledge, as an antique, any vehicle my children could lawfully have driven out of the dealer's showroom brand new!

Gil Fitzhugh, Morristown, NJ

Top
#509373 - 05/13/08 12:37 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: oldcarfudd]
ted sweet Offline
Member

Registered: 09/27/01
Posts: 1007
Loc: albany NY
attitudes that are killing the hobby.
_________________________
1974 Plymouth Cuda-360 Auto
1991 Chysler Lebaron Vert
1973 Dodge Dart Swinger-318 Auto
1970 Dodge Challenger R/T-440 Auto
1968 Chrysler 300 Convertible-440 Auto
1994 Ford Taurus SHO
1966 Chrysler Newport-383 auto

Top
#509374 - 05/13/08 12:42 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: oldcarfudd]
Restorer32 Offline
Member

Registered: 07/25/02
Posts: 1992
Loc: South Central Pa.
What irritates me is seeing articles where a streetrod is described as restored, as in, "Joe Speedbump purchased his Classic 1931 Ford Roadster at the Carlisle Flea Market 17 years ago and has spent the last decade restoring it with a new SBC engine, IFS, etc. It's either restored or it's rodded, can't be both unless one is speaking of restoring a vintage rod to it's originsal, as rodded, condition. I learned long ago not to get excited when the phone rings and someone asks "Do you buy classic cars?" Invariably it's a 15-20 year old 4 door sedan in "original" condition.
_________________________
1932 Packard 900 Conv Cpe
1933 Packard Coupe Sedan
1955 Jaguar XK-140 Drophead

Top
#509377 - 05/13/08 12:52 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: oldcarfudd]
1937hd45 Offline
Long Time Member

Registered: 11/01/01
Posts: 5269
Originally Posted By: oldcarfudd
I refuse to acknowledge, as an antique, any vehicle my children could lawfully have driven out of the dealer's showroom brand new!

Gil Fitzhugh, Morristown, NJ


Good for you! The yearly changing of the "Antique" defination is just plain STUPID! Pre WWII, Brass Era Pre 1916 and CCCA Classics are all you need to know to educate newbies, all the rest are Collector Cars.

Top
#509384 - 05/13/08 01:07 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 1937hd45]
stock_steve Offline
Member

Registered: 07/02/04
Posts: 585
Loc: The Mega-Nuts State
I'm going to guess that Bob must've once had a "run in" with some house painter who happened to have CT "antique" plates on his decrepit older work vehicle, and has never forgotten it.

As for me, I'm thankful that our state is so antique-vehicle-friendly ("antique" as definited by AACA, of course!).
_________________________
The Freewheelin' Stock Steve
Shoreline Antique Auto Connection
http://members.aol.com/SAACRegion/
Common Gear Antique Volkswagen Society
http://members.aol.com/commongear/

Top
#509389 - 05/13/08 01:22 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: Restorer32]
365 Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/07
Posts: 50
Thank you all for your input... Unfortunately the more I research this issue the more I become confused!!! I will try to compose myself and address the Antique/Classic subject after work tonight. I will close for now only to mention that I do find it interesting that somehow we have gone from "Vintage" automobiles to "Antique" automobiles to "Classic" automobiles and somehow gone back to Antique.
Would it not be cool to set some realistic guidelines.
Vintage: 1889-1919
Antique: 1920-1949
Classic: 1950-1964
Modern: 1965-1985
JUNK: 1986-2008




Top
#509395 - 05/13/08 01:40 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 365]
1937hd45 Offline
Long Time Member

Registered: 11/01/01
Posts: 5269
365, WHY can't you understand that the definitions have been in place since before your birth? The PC changing of everything to fit your version of history rather than acknowledge fact is most unfortunate.

Top
#509402 - 05/13/08 02:05 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 1937hd45]
Matt Harwood Offline
Member

Registered: 10/09/01
Posts: 1878
Loc: Cleveland, OH
I like precision in my language, too, and pretty much try to stick to the definitions given by the clubs. It grates on me when people call a 1971 Torino a classic. I've been around the Full Classics my entire life and don't have any trouble innately understanding which ones qualify and which don't. If you're familiar with the cars, you just know when something is special enough to be a Classic. If you read the CCCA message board below, you'll see an occasional Ford or Pontiac guy show up and ask something about his "classic" car. This is really one of only a few places where not knowing the specific definition can make things awkward.

I also struggle with what I call "modern" cars at shows (say, cars from the '70s on up), although their owners are rightfully very proud of their "old" cars.

On the other hand, it is just semantics and they're only words.

Get an "old" car and enjoy it no matter which category it fits.
_________________________
Matt Harwood (BCA #38767, AACA #987226)
1941 Century Sedanette
If you have a 1941-42 Buick with dual carbs, please visit: The Dual-Carb Registry


Top
#509414 - 05/13/08 03:06 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 1937hd45]
Stllrng. Offline
Member

Registered: 06/20/01
Posts: 122
Loc: British Columbia
I also grew up around old cars and have watched the degridation of terms over time. I enjoy and appreciate cars of all types and from all eras, including the modified ones. I just don't understand how anyone at any level can consider a 25 year old car an antique. Would a circa 1983 kitchen table and chairs be found in an antique furniture store or display? I enjoy the brass era cars, but to me it makes about as much sense to call a 1982 Ford crown victoria an antique as it would to call a 1918 Ford Model T a muscle car. In the 1960's and early 70's the groups of collector cars were very plainly and accurately grouped into classifications that made sense. That has been lost and I think it is too bad. But it's just my opinion and I am pretty sure what that is worth to most people.

Top
#509419 - 05/13/08 03:25 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: Chacheska]
Jim Rohn Offline
Member

Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 198
Loc: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally Posted By: Chacheska
Boy, this topic really hits home. Whenever I see the word 'Classic' used on a 1970 or 1980 something car on Craigslist I contact the owner and try to tell them what a real classic is by suggesting they do a Google search under the letters CCCA. 4 out of 5 times I get a reply that tells me to go F myself or to mind my own F'n business. I've been in some interesting and colorful verbal sparring matches with a few of these nitwits. Another thing I've tried to do, and in this case was successful, was to contact the local newspaper and the Swap Sheet and explain to the editors what a classic car was since they never seem to have any real classics (as defined by the CCCA) in their columns labeled 'Classic'. Both editors listened and understood my explanation and both changed their column headings by taking out the word 'Classic' and replacing it with Antique and/or Collector cars. It's a small step but one that may help younger collectors who don't have a clue as to the meaning of the word 'Classic' better understand the category to which their 1985 Monte Carlo or 1974 Chevelle fits in. I agree wholeheartedly that the word 'Classic' is probably the most over used and wrongly used term in the car hobby right next to the term 'frame off' restoration.


and "mint"

my mother taught me never to argue with a drunk or an idiot ...
_________________________
34 Ford Deluxe Tudor
all original, paint, etc
70 Camaro Z28
all stock, M-22
Scottsdale, AZ

Top
#509426 - 05/13/08 03:53 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: ted sweet]
Dave@Moon Offline
Long Time Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 7789
Loc: Fairfield (Cincinnati), OH
Originally Posted By: ted sweet
attitudes that are killing the hobby.

AMEN! smile

People act like this is a new phenomenon, and that they're the first ones to complain about stuff they don't think is old getting a due that (in their eyes) it doesn't deserve. It's actually gone on since the beginning. At age 50 I can remember 1957 Chevy restorers derisively being called "used car dealers".

If anything today's accredation of older cars is lightyears slower than it used to be. To wit:

1. The Studebaker Avanti first appeared on the cover of Hemmings' Special Interest Cars when it was an 8 year old car!

2. By 1980 at least 2 seperate publishers (Bookman Press and Evergreen Press) had published originality guides for Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes, and Thunderbirds. One or the other of them had produced guides for Falcons, GTOs, Chevelles, full-size Fords & Chevys, and about a dozen or so muscle cars that weren't quite 10 years old yet at the newest.

3. The Carlisle Swap Meet grew to rival Hershey in the 1970s largely as a result of catering to the very cars elitists within the AACA looked at down their noses. I understand that the start and growth of Carlisle was among the major reasons used to liberalize the AACA acceptance standards in the first place, lest it become a quaint relic itself.

Anyone who likes a car enought to preserve it (rather than to make it into something else) deserves recognition, whether that car is a curved dash Olds or an Olds Achieva. (Too new? Check out the rapidly increasing growth of Mazda Miata clubs!) If the AACA hadn't wisely seen fit to incorporate that element (with the reasonably prudent provision of a 25 year limit), it would've been lost by the side of history's road by now.

Those who don't like cars newer than the ones Barney Oldfield owned may not like having to share their hobby with the rest of us, but they're the beneficiaries of the co-mingling, not the other way around.
_________________________
[color:"blue"]"I stand by all the misstatements that I've made."[/color][color:"green"]

Top
#509431 - 05/13/08 04:01 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 365]
Dave@Moon Offline
Long Time Member

Registered: 12/14/99
Posts: 7789
Loc: Fairfield (Cincinnati), OH
Originally Posted By: 365
Thank you all for your input... Unfortunately the more I research this issue the more I become confused!!! I will try to compose myself and address the Antique/Classic subject after work tonight. I will close for now only to mention that I do find it interesting that somehow we have gone from "Vintage" automobiles to "Antique" automobiles to "Classic" automobiles and somehow gone back to Antique.
Would it not be cool to set some realistic guidelines.
Vintage: 1889-1919
Antique: 1920-1949
Classic: 1950-1964
Modern: 1965-1985
JUNK: 1986-2008




The VW Bug was built accross 4 of the eras you've outlined here. The Morgan +4 as well. There are prbably a dozen that cross 3 of these eras, and any such classification system will have the same problems.

Trying to give hard and fast categories in a product stream as fluid as automobiles over the years is impossible. Terms will come and go witht he ages they're from, much like the terms for the cars themselves do. If Phaeton, Cabriolet, Sedan, Coupe, Hardtop, etc. are negotiable terms, how can anything be set in stone just based on a year of manufacture?

We will forever be in a hobby where "collecting 1964 Dodges" will be a more meaningful term than "collecting antique cars". That's not all bad. Personally I think it's better overall not to try and pin everything and everyone down with arbitrary terms. smile


Edited by Dave@Moon (05/13/08 04:02 PM)
_________________________
[color:"blue"]"I stand by all the misstatements that I've made."[/color][color:"green"]

Top
#509437 - 05/13/08 04:18 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: Jim Rohn]
simplyconnected Offline
Member

Registered: 11/06/07
Posts: 540
Loc: Detroit (Royal Oak), Michigan
"Classic car is a term frequently used to describe an older car, but the exact meaning is subject to differences in opinion. Some are very inclusive, considering any older car in fine condition a classic. Others, including the "Concours d'Elegance" and the Classic Car Club of America maintain that 1948 is the last year for the true classics." - Wikipedia
So, there goes the '57 Bel Air, all the '50's Cadillac's, Amphicar's, some Packard's, Edsel's, Hudson's, etc.

Michigan issued a "HISTORIC VEHICLE" plate for my '55, charging only $30 for ten years. Michigan prides itself for hosting so many fine auto manufacturing companies. Instead of penalizing for owning a historic vehicle, they offer a little incentive. That's more consideration than the OEM's ever gave for their historic cars.

Your connotation of ANY term is generally and widely accepted, even when you don’t realize it. What is a Kleenex? It’s a paper hankie. I make Xerox copies, not photocopies. What the hell is a COKE, down south? Any soft drink.

My point is, I realize this site is about antique autos, and you may or may not even have one, by definition. All you Riatta guys, GET OUT! (Just kidding.) You get my drift. I saw discussion about proper grammar and spelling here last week, but generally, those English essentials are forgiven in this forum. Now we are defining old terms to be very specific. It ain’t going to happen. Pass me a paper hankie, I soiled my denim trousers with soda and potato crisps...

Top
#509462 - 05/13/08 05:51 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: mrpushbutton]
Sweepspear Offline
Member

Registered: 05/16/07
Posts: 42
Loc: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted By: mrpushbutton
"Classic" is a term thrown around by the general public and the media, used to describe anything that is out of production, an '89 Caprice Classic with 22" ghetto rims is described as "classic" To further explain what 58 mustang said, most states determine that any vehicle 25 years old or older to be an antique. I came into the antique car hobby in the 60s as a kid, so I have a hard time seeing a 1980 Monte Carlo as an antique, but by definition it is.
The Classic Car Club of America made a list not long after their forming that clearly states what is a classic car by their recognition, and what they will accept/judge at their meets. The cars the CCCA defines as "Full Classics" (a term they had to invent and trademark due to the inability of any group of people to "own" a word) were very expensive when new, sold to an exclusive clientele and sometimes featured advanced engineering, sometimes very un-advanced engineering, and were built between 1925 and 1948. Most, if not all of the post-war cars on their list ('46-'48) are built on chassis' that were used before the war and sometimes have superficial cosmetic changes to the bodies.
I personally prefer to only refer to cars on the CCCA list as "Classics" and use the other terms that apply to a given vehicle such as:

Gas Buggy
Early automobile
Brass car
antique car
'teens car
twenties car
thirties car
exotic car
forties car
fifties car
fin mobile
22 feet of bad taste
sixties car
compact car
sports car
muscle car
seventies junk
General Lee clone
eighties junk
struggle buggy
hobby horse (jacked up pick-up truck)
beater car
hooptie car
Pimp mobile

this is only a partial list. I am not in the CCCA, don't have any problem at all with their list or goals as a club, I just don't like the word "Classic" thrown around.


Same here.
I consider the CCCA's list as gospel when it comes to the word Classic being used in reference to a car.
Having a father who was a CCCA member while growing up, it is ingrained in my head.

I have given up trying to educate people as to the proper application of the term.
It still gets under my skin to hear the term thrown about to describe any older car.


Edited by Sweepspear (05/13/08 05:52 PM)
_________________________
Dale

Top
#509483 - 05/13/08 08:25 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: 58Mustang]
365 Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/07
Posts: 50
58 Mustang... Thank you for your message!!! CCCA and AACA look like a good place to start.

Top
#509485 - 05/13/08 08:28 PM Re: Antique or Classic [Re: Peter Gariepy]
365 Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/07
Posts: 50
Peter Gariepy... Thank you for your message. What an impressive list of fine automobiles!!!

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >