Guest Posted December 29, 2000 Share Posted December 29, 2000 My grandfather is the driver of the car in the attached photo. I would<BR>appreciate any help or suggestions you might have as to the identification<BR>of the car - which would be a help to my family in dating the photo.<P> <P>Spencer Roane<BR>Spencer@Roane.com<P><P>------------------<BR>Peter Gariepy<BR>peterg@aaca.org<P>www.aaca.org Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndianaCarGuy Posted December 29, 2000 Share Posted December 29, 2000 Car is 1913-1915,...not a Cadillac. Hats are suggestive of 1916-1919. Similar in size to a Moon,..but I don't think Moon had nickel rings on headlights, and these look to have some ornamentation on the headlight rings. Like a Buick. If I can find my pictures of the small car Olds produced around 1915,...nah,..it's not an Olds. Buick had a different headlight assembly,..but the sides look Buick-ish. No,..cowl is wrong. I don't know what it is,..I just know about when it is. Leaning to Buick, though.<P>RS<P>[This message has been edited by IndianaCarGuy (edited 12-29-2000).]<p>[This message has been edited by IndianaCarGuy (edited 12-29-2000).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasBorchers Posted December 29, 2000 Share Posted December 29, 2000 At the moment I would say that it is a 1913 or 1914 Buick?<P>Tom<P>------------------<BR>Thomas Borchers<BR>Member of AACA # 004829<BR>HCCA and MAFCA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob McAnlis Posted December 29, 2000 Share Posted December 29, 2000 I believe that this is a 1915 Studebaker "Four" Touring Car "5-D". I note no differences from my referance book. Headlights carried high, door profiles all the same. Windshield top assy and boot. 1916 reference to the Studebaker 4 is similiar, but the top boot is different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Paulsen Posted December 30, 2000 Share Posted December 30, 2000 I agree it is a 1915 Studebaker. We have two 1913 Buicks in our family, and I feel it is definately not a Buick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasBorchers Posted December 30, 2000 Share Posted December 30, 2000 Ok, ok~~<BR>You have won. I agree with you two. It seems to be a 1915 Studebaker.<P>Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now