'72 LeSabre Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 I recently purchased this topper. It caught my eye because of it's old age and weight. The U's appear as V's. The back is inscribed "Pattern Do not destroy 1944" Maybe this was done to save it from a metal scrap drive? Any other ideas? Thanks 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Steel Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 A fantastic piece, I love it! I hope you uncover the history for all of us to enjoy and learn from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ply33 Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 I wonder if it is actually a master pattern that was used to make molds for producing the toppers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lump Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 I have one like this. No inscription on back, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJFord54 Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 (edited) I have a two of them - pretty sure no "Pattern". While common, they are class pieces - well made. Yours is especially nice. Great find! Perhaps you might swap for a couple of old replacements from the AACA and offer it to them for the library. I would think they would appreciate it for historical purposes. Edited July 19, 2018 by AJFord54 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_S_in_Penna Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 (edited) The earlier logo for the AACA looked pretty much the same as the current one, but as you noted, the letters "U" were the ancient Roman style that looked like letters "V." By some time in the 1950's, the letters were U's. Your example must have been a master of some type, used for molding others. It would not have been marked "pattern" just to save it from a scrap drive: Its owner wouldn't discard a newly purchased item in 1944 just to contribute scrap! Edited July 19, 2018 by John_S_in_Penna (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Moskowitz Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Nope!! It is not a master, there are plenty of these around with the same inscription on the back. We have a couple in the library. Steve Rossi is doing a story on our emblem for a future issue of the magazine. Sorry, but we have never been able to get the definitive story on this particular piece Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restorer32 Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 If these emblems were cast using the lost wax technique the inscription on the back would also be reproduced if the original pattern had the inscription. I suspect that is the case since the inscription seems to have been in the casting rather than scratched in. The original pattern had the inscription so all emblems produced using that pattern would be likewise inscribed. Now if you find one with that inscription scratched in you might really have something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Bond Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Wonder if these were done by a region and not through official channels? It'll be interesting to see the story on or logo's history. Terry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Moskowitz Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 Terry definitely done by national, before your time!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'72 LeSabre Posted July 19, 2018 Author Share Posted July 19, 2018 Thanks for the responses. Hopefully the full history of these will come out one day. I look forward to Steve's article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe in Canada Posted July 22, 2018 Share Posted July 22, 2018 Castings have shrinkage to them. You could measure them and the largest one could have been the pattern. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now