Jump to content

1919 Buick Roadster


NZ Buick

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Morgan Wright said:
8 hours ago, Morgan Wright said:

DSCN4066.JPG

DSCN4060.JPG

DSCN4062.JPG

DSCN4063.JPG

DSCN4064.JPG

DSCN4065.JPG

would it be too much to ask if you could possibly take some basic measurements of this subframe to give me a starting point to work from? It looks really nice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NZ Buick,

Building a new wood frame is a major undertaking.    If Morgan is prepared to part with that frame he has, it could save you years of work.  The E49 body is a bit longer than the five seater,  but it could be adapted.  Otherwise,  the best way is to tacweld the body together to get the correct shape and then make lots of ply pattens of all the parts. 

IMG_0108.JPG

IMG_0081.JPG

IMG_0082.jpg

IMG_0086.JPG

IMG_0101.JPG

IMG_0093.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankyou very much for all of these photos! It gives me an idea of what I’m in for. I’m not trying to set any speed records with this restoration so am not really concerned that it will take me a great deal of time to piece something together it’s all part of the adventure in my opinion. Plus I don’t think it is a viable option to attempt to ship such a bulky item out to NZ and expect it to survive the journey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

hi morgan  ,  i have a 1918 e-44 roadster with a rusted out engine hood and two left side panels beyond repair was wondering weither your spare part car hood may be available to purchase,I too live in new zealand and shipping is no barrier.have had my car running and driving,thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2021 at 9:23 PM, donald w said:

hi morgan  ,  i have a 1918 e-44 roadster with a rusted out engine hood and two left side panels beyond repair was wondering weither your spare part car hood may be available to purchase,I too live in new zealand and shipping is no barrier.have had my car running and driving,thanks

Which panels are you after? I may have some that are salvageable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, donald w said:

hi Morgan thanks for the pictures of the hood it looks 100% better than mine.would be glad to pay $50.00 us for it. can we get in touch by email,and a rough idea on cost to ship South Canterbury zip 7925 New Zealand thanks again donald w

Shipping odd shaped bits from USA can be horrendously expensive

Have not used them, but these guys have been used by others in NZ

https://www.kiwishipping.co.nz/

Edited by 1939_Buick (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2021 at 8:55 PM, donald w said:

hi morgan thanks for the pictures of the hood it looks 100% better than mine.would be glad to pay $50.00 us for it. can we get in touch by email,and a rough idea on cost to ship south canterbury zip 7925 new zealand thanks again donald w

 

Just to make sure my hood fits yours, I looked it up, and all E-H-K hoods for 6 cylinder are the same part number.

 

 

hood 001.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi morgan engine hood was just what I looking for and freight costs were reasonable shame you sold it to another member has any other buick owners out there got any side pannels or top panels they are willing to part with.thaks donald w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I think I may have figured out my radiator bracket issue. It would appear to me that perhaps 1918 had the cast brackets and a shorter radiator and 1919 the pressed steel type brackets with a taller radiator. Can anyone tell me if this is correct or am I completely wrong? I seem to have two different radiators and need to be sure which one to use on my tourer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 12/7/2021 at 8:36 AM, Rod Wise said:

My 1920 has pressed brackets.  My understanding is that 1919 and 1920,  there were no changes between the two years.  Not sure when they changed from cast to pressed brackets.

What is the overall height of your 1920 radiator Rod? The shroud I have with the cast brackets is quite a lot shorter than the others and seems to match my father’s 1916. I’m pretty sure I’m right to stick with the taller one with pressed brackets for my 1919 although the coolant outlet pipe off the engine doesn’t align very nicely with the radiator inlet. I guess I’ll find out the hard way if I’m wrong when it comes to lining up my bonnet between cowl and radiator later down the track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
On 9/12/2018 at 3:25 PM, NZ Buick said:

.... have managed to find a ball bearing of very similar dimensions that I have managed to graft into place. Will be interesting to see if this is a success or not!

 

B8A72410-590F-475D-ABB3-D37572E19DFF.jpeg

I just ran across this thread - not being a "Buick" guy but always interested in brass and teens cars.

I would be very careful about the use of ball bearings for rollers. If the outer race is harder than the surface of the camshaft — which was almost certainly only surface hardened — those ball bearings will destroy the cam lobes as soon as the hardened surface wears through. You'd be far better off with solid rollers that are not hardened as they will be far easier to replace than a camshaft.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

How many leaves should the rear springs of a 1919 Tourer have? I have two pairs of springs in my pile of bits one is much lighter that the other. I’m assuming the lighter are for a Roadster or possibly for a four cylinder car and the heavier are the ones for the Tourer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NZ Buick,

I think that you should think twice and think very hard again about using a ball bearing in the roller lifter assemblies in your engine.  You DO NOT want to run two hardened materials against each other in a situation like this.  It is this persons opinion that this is a recipe for disaster with regard to the camshaft.  At first glance a person might think that this is a really slick thing to do, but if you do this, you are inviting trouble in the end.  I hope that someone with metallurgical experience will chime in on this.  Please do not do this.  Mr. Marr and his engineers at the time had things figured out really well.  Do no try to re-invent the wheel here.

 

Terry Wiegand

South Hutchinson, Kansas

AACA Life Member #947918

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Oldtech said:

I would think... lighter ones for open cars, heavier for sedans. 

I would agree with that thinking only I have no sedan parts in my pile only tourer and roadster. I can only assume the tourer needs the heavier ones for carrying passengers over the rear axle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Terry Wiegand said:

NZ Buick,

I think that you should think twice and think very hard again about using a ball bearing in the roller lifter assemblies in your engine.  You DO NOT want to run two hardened materials against each other in a situation like this.  It is this persons opinion that this is a recipe for disaster with regard to the camshaft.  At first glance a person might think that this is a really slick thing to do, but if you do this, you are inviting trouble in the end.  I hope that someone with metallurgical experience will chime in on this.  Please do not do this.  Mr. Marr and his engineers at the time had things figured out really well.  Do no try to re-invent the wheel here.

 

Terry Wiegand

South Hutchinson, Kansas

AACA Life Member #947918

Hi Terry,

It certainly has to be a sign that numerous people of different backgrounds have suggested this is not a good idea. I have set a goal of trying to start this engine by the end of the year so still have plenty of time to refit solid rollers if I need to. I’ve kept everything i need to do this and at least it can be done without tearing the whole engine down again! Once I’ve done a little more research I’ll make a choice.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My initial concern of using ball bearings in the valve train is that the bearing lacks the ability to endure the impact that valve train components must endure, largely due to valve lash. I have seen bearing races shatter due to impact and shock loading , a non ferrous bushing would have survived. Softer metals such as brass, bronze and copper wear faster BUT they are superior in absorbing impact loading.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, raydurr said:

My initial concern of using ball bearings in the valve train is that the bearing lacks the ability to endure the impact that valve train components must endure, largely due to valve lash. I have seen bearing races shatter due to impact and shock loading , a non ferrous bushing would have survived. Softer metals such as brass, bronze and copper wear faster BUT they are superior in absorbing impact loading.

My theory when I did it was the cam lobes in these engines are so gentle and valve springs so soft that I would get away with it. My main goal was to attempt to reduce a bit of friction and be sure the rollers were perfectly round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rod Wise said:

My 1920 roadster has 11 leaves in the rear springs.

The springs that were on my chassis which I’m sure is a H45 Tourer are 15 leaves and seem really heavy and the springs In the mountain of parts are 8 leaves but I have a feeling may be off a 4 cylinder car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...