Eric W

1952 Studebaker Commander Starlight Coupe

Recommended Posts

After several months of no vintage car around, I got this Studebaker last week. I had been scanning the c-list ads here and to about 500 miles out for the past couple of months. Don't know anything in particular about Studebakers - if you've seen my other threads (and listed in the signature), I've worked with Buicks for the past 4 years or so. Anyway, this one was very easy for me to get to for a look over, was in the budget, seems to run well enough, and is in better condition than the last 2 Buicks I was working on. As in, I hope it doesn't take as long before I'm driving it. I do most all work myself.

 

The main purpose for these cars has been to take my wife and kids to the Thursday night cruise night for burgers & frozen custard, though I've done a several of the more formalized shows around here. I like the cruise night because you show up when you want and leave when you want - or choose to do something else that week.

 

The main immediate needs for this car are complete brake system overhaul. It has zero brakes whatsoever. So I was able to drive it (slowly) around the seller's yard, and up into my garage, and that's about it. The other main need is seatbelts, especially in back for my kids. I've done both of these projects multiple times before on the Buicks, so I hope that Studebaker isn't too hard to figure out.

 

These pics are from the c-list ad.

52_stude_right_side.jpg

52_stude_right_front.jpg

52_stude_rear.jpg

52_stude_left_rear.jpg

52_stude_left_front.jpg

52_stude_dash.jpg

52_stude_front_seat.jpg

52_stude_back_seat.jpg

52_stude_engine_front.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No hill holder in this one. This looks to be a fairly low-option car - no radio, though there's an antenna on the right front fender, and a radio in the trunk.

 

First day, I got the master cylinder out and the front drums off. Looking online, I saw that the rear drums require a puller. I don't recall exactly how the Buick rear drums were secured, but they didn't need a puller. I ordered the rear seat belts (I had fronts in the right color that I never got to installing in one of the Buicks), master cylinder, wheel cylinders, and the front hoses. I got the wheel cylinders, and though the website I ordered from said all 4 are the same, I should have known the fronts would be different. FLAPS didn't have the fronts either, so I'll get those from a Studebaker specialty place. One of the big Studebaker parts specialist shops is just 90 miles up the road from here.

 

This week - got the puller and got the rear drums pulled. Got the wheel cylinders swapped in there. Received the '51-'52 Studebaker shop manual from Faxonautolit on eBay. That shows me that the front brakes may be missing the adjusters. It did look a little weird to me - there's no "star wheel" adjuster at the bottom like on the rears. Got the rear seat belts installed.

athome_leftside.jpg

athome_rightfront.jpg

athome_leftrear.jpg

athome_trunk.jpg

seatbelts_b4_seat.jpg

seatbelts_done.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eric, if these are still the '52 brakes (as opposed to being upgraded to later Studebaker brakes), they did have a weird self-adjuster system that many people did remove. The parts are still available from Studebaker vendors to put the system back if you desire. But adjusting the shoes every so often is not too hard. :)  This style brakes are a little harder to adjust but not so bad once you get used to it.

 

A simple and very effective upgrade is to use '54 thru '62 Studebaker V8 drum brakes on your car - pretty much a bolt in swap, and a lot more braking power since they are self-energizing design. They use the star wheel adjuster system. The are not self adjusting, but if you really want that you can use '64 thru '66 Studebaker V8 drum brakes which had a self-adjuster system.

 

Neat car, keep the reports and pictures coming!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul - I'll look into the later brakes.

 

Got the new master cylinder in. I'll post a picture later. Photos here - some brake master mounting parts I soaked in Evap-o-rust overnight, and a quick appearance improvement for the trunk emblem.

brakeparts.jpg

trunkemb01.jpg

trunkemb02.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evap o rust works pretty well. I was impressed with the cylinder plunger in particular. The cleaner-looking washers and the spring clip started out less rusty than the larger washers and the nuts.

 

I'll drive it at least weekly - usually to the Thursday cruise night at Freddy's at Orange Grove & Thornydale, and also a couple of times/year to the Cars & Coffee at La Encantada, but also just around the neighborhood. At the C&C, it's fun to see my low-$$$ vintage car parked between a classic 300SL and a new McLaren...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had cross-threaded the original brake "V" or "Y" block, so while I was out of town the past few days, I ordered another block & bolt kit (from Midwest Jeep Willys - in Florida). Not the same angle as the one I took off, but easy enough to get the lines to fit. Also worked through the front seat belts this afternoon. Will add photo of them fastened down, but now waiting for the paint to dry on the under-floor backing plates (all seatbelt parts from Juliano's).

brake_master_parts01.jpg

brake_master_redo.jpg

front_belts_01.jpg

front_belts_02.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good work Eric!

 

One caution - I can see in the pic of the master cylinder that the fabric covering on your brake light wiring is gone in one place. Had the same issue in some places on my '54 sedan. On bare or damaged areas, I used the liquid electrical tape made by the same folks who make Plasti-Dip. A couple of coats will cover the areas. If the wires are bare, it takes more coats. It works really great where the fabric is just damaged. Bare areas like this are a fire hazard, if powered wires get moved against a grounded area (like under the dash) you will have a dead short. Not a criticism of your car, just a safety concern I wanted to bring up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the brake switch wires are on the list. I work from an excel spreadsheet rather than trying to keep it in my head or on random pages. I prioritize the spreadsheet - to try to keep the whole car from being taken apart at once, and so I can "check off" jobs as they are completed.

 

I don't have it in front of me at the moment, but columns are along the lines of: "item" "system" "priority" "est. cost" "supplier" "done" "date done" "actual cost". Also helps to remember later what I did...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was looking through the shop manual to understand what self-adjusting parts are missing from the front brakes. In the same section, there are photos of rear brakes with self adjusters. Checked the spec's on the car - front brakes, 11", rear brakes 9". I'm thinking the rear brakes on the floor under the car now are about the same size as the fronts. They didn't have self-adjusters, they have the "star wheel" adjusters that I backed off as part of getting the drums off.

 

I haven't worked on Studebaker before, so I didn't think anything of fronts with self-adjusters and rear with manual, but I measured the rears this morning - 11". So they're later. The wheel cylinders that I got ('52) didn't look right either - they fit, but the push rods out of the cylinders looked too short. So I'm concluding this car already has later rear brakes. Will check around to see if I can come up with some later front brakes to match the rears.

 

I pulled the right tail light housing because the tail light wasn't working. I figured, blown bulb. Under there, I see this car has been 2 shades of blue, 2 shades of white/off white, as well as red. The bulb looked good. I used a buzzer voltage detector rather than a meter to trace where the power was going. Found the hot line at the left side of the car with the tail lights switched on. On the right side, found which wire was hot for the turn signal, so the other one must be the tail. There's an open in that line somewhere. As a quick check, I ran another wire across the car from left to right, and the right tail now lights.

 

Pulled the left tail light housing to clean it out. The right one had quite a bit of fine sand dust inside which would make the light less bright. Found the same on the left, but with the lens itself cracked into several pieces. Also popped the reflectors out of the bottom of the light surround trim - those are both fried from years of exposure, and replacements are available - would like to have some good reflectors at night in case the bulbs either aren't very bright or go out for some reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eric, post some pictures of the brakes, showing the 'inside' of the backing plates with the shoes, cylinders, springs on, and we may be able to help you figure out what you have. Possibly the rear axle was changed out with a later one, and the brakes that came with the rear axle were used.

 

The only 11" rear brakes used on postwar Studebaker cars were part of the '63 thru '66 disc brake system. The front were disc brakes, and the rear had 11" non-energizing drum brakes.

 

We should be able to help you figure this out, but pictures are a must. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eric, double check the inside diameter of the rear drums. Yes, those are 'later' rear brakes, self-energizing design. But if the rear drums/brakes are really 11", they could be off something other than a Studebaker.

 

 I noticed that there are no pushrods connecting the wheel cylinders to the shoes on the rear brakes. Also, the emergency brake cable appears to be cobbled up - there should be a long tightly wound spring on the e-brake cable just in front of where the cable hooks to the lever on the rear shoe. There should also be an outer sheath on the e-brake cable (just forward of the backing plates) that fastens to the backing plate.

 

Here is a pic of a Studebaker rear brake setup, showing the e-brake cable spring, and also the outer sheath (on the left side above the leaf spring.

 

DSC04250.thumb.JPG.00add49369d7c160c072fd0e617ad1d1.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - what year / year range of brake is in your photo? There don't appear to be any pushrods on the wheel cylinder on the brake in my photo, but they're in there. I bought the wheel cylinders for '52, and the push rods are really short. The wheel cylinder that I took off had longer pushrods. Yes the parking brake cable is spliced, but there's an issue farther forward with that cable that I haven't figured out yet. I think it's routed on the wrong side of the exhaust, so it hits the exhaust. I haven't found a diagram that shows the cable relative to the exhaust, so I'll be looking for photos of the bottom side of the car. There's also a non-stock left-side exhaust on my car (it's a completely split exhaust) that may also interfere with the brake cable.

 

The ID of the brake drum (surface the shoes run on) is 10".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eric, the brakes shown in my picture are 10" rear brakes (cars with drums front and rear), years '54 thru '62. These are what you have on the rear of your car (but NOT the front). The '63 thru '66 were essentially the same, but with a self-adjusting system added.

 

If the rear brake picture in your post from yesterday is showing the new wheel cylinder installed, it is NOT correct. The '52 style wheel cylinders you ordered will NOT work with that later style of brakes. The '52 system did not utilize the pushrods, because the shoes were shaped different. See the diagram from the Parts Manual posted below of the '51 thru '53 Commander rear brakes. You will need wheel cylinders for the rear of a '55 thru '66 V8 car, Studebaker part number 535586, to make your existing rear brakes work correctly.

 

If you stay with the current setup, you have a mis-match of brakes - non self-energizing on the front, and self-energizing on the rear. The self-energizing are better/more powerful brakes and may put you in a situation of the rears locking up before the fronts which is not good. You may want to consider swapping the fronts to 11" Studebaker drum brakes '54 thru '66 style. This would give you a much better braking system, plus consistency between front and rear.

 

Also, if you are planning to keep this car, invest in a Shop Manual and Parts Manual. I believe they are available on CD from Studebaker vendors. Chuck Collins at www.studebakerparts.com probably has them. If not, Studebaker International has them.

 

 

Commander Brakes.jpg

Edited by r1lark
added more info (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul - what you describe is in line with what I was thinking. I did get the '52 shop manual, one of the first things I bought. But as you point out, the brakes I've got don't match what's in the '52 book... Yes, I figured the '52 wheel cyl's that I got won't work with the rear brakes - just wanted to ID which ones they are to get the correct cylinders. 

 

Yes, I'll be looking for the later brakes for the front to keep the front/rear balance correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A '57 Silver Hawk V8 gave up its brakes today. It had already had the roof cut off, engine removed, interior stripped, etc... Finned drums pretty cool - too bad these get covered up. Also picked up the parking brake cable clip that's missing from my master cylinder installation photo and 1 more 15" rim for the spare (there was a 14" in there with no tire when I got the car). Also got through DMV for new title & plate.

 

57_brakes_01.jpg

57_brakes_02.jpg

plate.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Eric W said:

A '57 Silver Hawk V8 gave up its brakes today. 

Also got through DMV for new title & plate.

 

Good deal Eric! That '52 will stop with the best of them with those brakes on the front.

 

I see you are in Arizona, what area? My youngest son lives in Scottsdale. We are going out for a couple of weeks in late October/early November.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now