Jump to content

My 1910 Mitchell "parts car" project


Recommended Posts

On 3/15/2019 at 9:07 AM, Frank Tate said:

I am not an engineer by any stretch of the imagination, so please take this with a large grain of salt.  Rather than a coil spring, would it be easier to put some sort of leaf spring under the vanes?


Originally, that is exactly what I had intended. There are one or two complications. First, is finding a spring that can be relied on to survive the huge number of cycles the spinning pump will produce. If a flat spring broke, and the two pieces ended up on top of each other, this could stop the vane from being able to retract far enough thus badly jamming - and I suspect wrecking, the pump. I'm thinking coil springs would be safer since if one of those broke most likely the pieces would remain in the holes... though I'm not entirely satisfied with that idea. Hence my plan to test the pump without any springs at all.

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you bore a hole lengthwise in the vane and fill it with lead.  Would the added weight be enough to ensure that the vane followed the contour of the body tightly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The vanes are only slightly more than 1/2" tall and 1/4" thick. If I drilled a hole through them and filled it with lead - which might be a lot more difficult than it sounds, I doubt the difference in weight would be significant. I think that making a fixture and drilling holes for coil springs - for that I could probably get some springs that are actually made for vane pumps - might be easier.

 

This is a rare situation where a small, precise drill press or mill would be an advantage but I recoil at buying another machine to do just one job.

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand you want to make all the parts yourself for this project, but have you considered making a housing for a gerotor/trocoid type oil pump that you canibilized from a modern car/motorcycle? With the considerable effort that you have put into this project, would the peace of mind of having a proper pump hidden inside a housing that you fabricated be more acceptable to something that you are not 100% will work for at least 10,000 miles or more? I am not a fan of vane type oil pumps for any application especially for the “heart” of an engine.

I am not posting this to throw stones at you, only to see that you are successful at realizing your vision of a completed project that can be driven without worrying that the oil pump is supplying enough oil to the parts that are made out of unobtainium.

Jim

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it doesn't work I would certainly consider that path but part of my goal is to do everything using the technology readily available during the working life of the car which, I tend to think of as 1910 to 1915. I don't claim to have entirely succeeded, at least in that the some of the materials I've used don't fit that criteria and a few of my machines are a bit newer. That said, the reason behind all the testing is that I want to run the pump, and eventually the entire oiling system, off the car for a considerable time before it is assembled on the engine. This is probably the most critical element of the engine work since everything else is relatively uninnovative.

 

My primary engineering text is the 1910/1912 edition P.M. Heldt's The Gasoline Automobile. There are elements I've stretched the logic on - the use of aluminum pistons is something Heldt didn't mention but I know that W.O. Betley was using them in his DFP racing cars before 1914. The same can be said for aluminum connecting rods which were at the very beginning of their development during WWI and don't really start to be adopted until after the war and then only in an experimental sense. Some of my diversions from the goal are simply dictated by what I can make with the machines I have.

 

There is more to the oiling system than I've mentioned so far. In addition to the vane pump, I'm designing a small hand pump to incorporate in the system that will allow me to pump up oil pressure before the engine is started. I'm not yet sure how that will work but it might give me a margin of safety should the vane pump fail in use...maybe. It is just the concerns you mention that make me want to test the system without the springs. The basic pump is an extremely simple device. If it works as it is, it will be practically indestructible as long as there is oil in it.

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vane pumps were invented in the 1870s and are described and illustrated in Heldt's book. He mentions their occasional use for both oil and water. The Mercer used a simplified version of the vane pump for oil. I chose to use one for two reasons... they are self-priming and whatever pump I use has to be able to pull oil up from the sump because the pump is located on the back of the engine. That location was determined by the need to have some means of driving the pump.

 

The original system was a semi-total loss with an oiler on the side of the engine, belt driven from the front pulley. There is no built-in drive for an oil pump and, in any case, I am trying not to make any permanent modifications to the original parts of the engine. The only place I could think of to put the pump was on the back of the camshaft taking the place of the rear camshaft bearing holder. In putting the pump there, there are serious size limits because it fits inside the front rim of the flywheel.

 

I also thought of making a pump that could be driven by the water pump/magneto shaft but that would have had to be self-priming as well. There was no way I could think of locating a gear pump low enough on the engine so that it did not have to pull oil up from the sump. I actually started out with a gear pump design and have designed both gear and plunger pumps for this application – neither of which were anywhere as near and simple as this pump.

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chevy stovebolt 6's from 29' up to the mid thirties used a vane pump as standard. Have always had no issue with the vane pumps. The Chevy wasn't pressurized so the pump's operation was to flow oil to the troughs for the dippers, the center main bearing, the rocker shafts, and to spray on the timing gears. At temp oil pressure was often 10-12psi. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been struggling away with the oil pump. This is probably the most precise thing I've ever made and getting it right is proving a challenge. I finally got the rotor in and I've lapped the vanes so that they slide by gravity with no noticeable side-to-side play.

 

IMG_1235.thumb.JPG.6ae191ef31aedb9dbe86f54cde27732f.JPG 

 

I then put it together and discovered that it binds slightly when the cap screws were tightened down - but not when they were slightly loose. It took me nearly all day to figure this one out but now I think I've got it. It looks as if the small end center shaft - that takes the place of the camshaft - is very slightly off center. I'll make another one tomorrow but in the meantime, I did get it so that it turns with only a hint of binding. With luck, I may be able to assemble it and test it tomorrow although first I'll have to buy a gallon of cheap motor oil because I don't want to use the abrasive stuff I used the first time.

 

IMG_1236.thumb.JPG.f853c1f733db3ca17389cda90561540d.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JV, I see that you are using the 1910-1912 edition of Heldt's work as a guide to materials. It may please you to hear that in the 1916 (5th) edition he goes into considerable detail on  the use of Aluminium pistons.

 

'Aluminium Pistons. - High speed engines are often fitted with pistons cast of aluminium alloy......'  page 161.

 

So it appears that you are not too far ahead of the times, if at all, in using aluminium.

 

I'm finding Heldt's work fascinating reading. I must thank you for recommending it in an earlier post . Keep up the good work, as there are many of us lurkers out here following it, I am sure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a lot of respect for Heldt. He appears to have stayed right on top of current developments but I'm surprised he knew about aluminum pistons in 1916... that's really interesting because in 1914, at the beginning of WWI. W.O. Bentley showed them to the Admiralty - he'd been using them in his racing cars but until then he'd kept it secret. The Admiralty was so impressed that they commissioned him into the Navy as a Lt. and assigned him to aircraft engine design. As he tells the story, he left that morning to see Admiral Hall and came back as a naval officer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...I put it together and tried it. It looks as if I'll have to incorporate the springs. It did draw up some oil but not enough, or fast enough, to be satisfactory.

I am going to take it apart again on the test stand to see if the blades are actually moving - they may not be. Getting the right fit and finish is proving to be a real challenge.

 

jp

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not surprised it didn't work though I didn't anticipate the reason. One of the things I did this morning was polishing the vanes. I did that with a piece of 500 grit wet or dry using the lapping plate as the flat surface.

 

IMG_1237.thumb.JPG.42d033e04c0d7d95092ff6a7c94d93c3.JPG

 

The result was quite satisfactory. The vanes fell into place from gravity alone.

I then assembled the pump and ran it - to no avail. It did pull up a little oil but not enough to reach the pump. I then took the end plate off but left it on the stand so I could easily rotate it and see what was happening.

 

IMG_1238.thumb.JPG.32b8ea4c43441864f83153b20aa10b33.JPG

 

It turns out that the surface tension of the oil is enough to keep the vanes from sliding out. Aside from that, I suspect it will work brilliantly. In fact, it was drawing weakly without the vanes doing anything at all which I take to be a very good sign. The pump is also turning very smoothly. So, now I have to design a fixture to hold the vanes while I drill holes in them for little springs. This is actually a real challenge for me because the fixture will have to be extremely precise. There is very little room to work with and since the vanes were made on the rotor, replacing them could be a major undertaking. I'll have to make the fixture and make a few test vanes to set it up so that when I do make the holes I'm confident they will be in the right place and the right depth. I'd also like to find some real vane pump springs 1/8" in diameter and about 1/2" long. I don 't know if that is realistic...for the moment I'll get something from McMaster Carr but I'm concerned about the huge number of cycles these springs will have to sustain. One potential problem is that the pump itself will be inaccessible when the engine is assembled. To get to it, I'd have to take the engine out and remove the flywheel. Thankfully, that isn't a big deal on a brass car but it isn't the sort of repair you can do on the side of the road.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Persistence is always good.  I think if you do a google search for modern vane pumps and do a bit of sleuthing around you would locate something modern with the same vane width as you have built then buy a set of replacement springs.  When ever I rebuilt vane pumps in the past, the kit always came with replacement fiber vanes and a full set of springs.  Our vane pumps rand wide open, 24/7 for 3-4 years between rebuilds.  That is a bunch of run time your pump will never see!  (At least I am guessing). 

Al

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but the speed I'm running the tests at is probably close to a comfortable cruising speed. As it is,  it wouldn't pump oil at idle or even slow speeds. But, I had springs behind the earlier vanes and that pump worked so I am certain this one will. Tomorrow I'll start on a fixture to drill the holes...I've been giving it some thought and I think I can make one that will do the job.

 

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Setting up to drill holes for the little springs is taking some time since as I've noted before, I'm not really equipped to make fiddly little parts. I need a drill press that has some means of controlling the downward travel of the quill and, unfortunately, the only machine I have is this small antique... probably the first machine I bought for this shop. I paid $25 for it on the local CL. When I got it back to the shop (I bought it in the dark) I discovered that the taper in the quill was really messed up. I "sort of" fixed that a long time ago but it still runs out about .005. Oddly enough, in this case, that might be a good thing. Yesterday I faced off the table. It is full of divots from sloppy workmen in the past and perhaps I should fix that someday but for now, I just wanted to be confident it was flat.

 

IMG_1239.thumb.JPG.f28e78b8454df8e1417e67d380ac633b.JPG

 

The next step was to make a sliding stop to fit on the quill. I've wanted to do this for a long time but all my ideas were over complicated.  I finally thought of a simple way to do it but marvel that it took me so long to come up with an idea.

 

IMG_1240.thumb.JPG.9e7d519803d3a96036826553e13e9e27.JPG

 

Here it is clamped on the quill. I used two of the nylon tipped set screws to hold it in place so they don't put a burr in the bronze quill.

 

IMG_1241.thumb.JPG.28160cfb7b0361e7c1f96029097c5c1f.JPG

 

Tomorrow I'll start on the holding fixture. Then I have to make another set of vanes - not to use but to test the setup with. I do not want to try drilling the actual vanes until I'm certain the technique will work.

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The holding fixture for the vanes...

 

IMG_1242.JPG.db17a65bb5ea0e1abaaff82d2ad3e265.JPG

 

IMG_1243.JPG.cd40514c508d962458c489be9228f9bf.JPG

 

The groove is a little tight. The vanes are actually .258 thick and fitted to the slots in the rotor. I would have liked to use the same cutter for the fixture but getting the 1/8" hole exactly in the center of the groove may have been a problem. I used an end mill to make the slot in the fixture but drilled the hole first - both operations were done without removing the piece from the vise. The big hole is for a 3/8 cap screw to hold the fixture down. I may even drill and tap a hole in the drill press table - something I'd never do were it not that it's full of holes already. The small hole is to locate the end mill directly in the center of the vane.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, alsfarms said:

Very Crafty

 

It is indeed though I believe it could be seen as cheating.  A real mechanic would eye-ball that with a hand held drill in one hand, the vane in the other while walking through a shop lit by a single light bulb.  (I would mention that the bit would be bent and dull but I think that's obvious) ;)

 

I hope that reading about Joe's patience will somehow rub off on me. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't he supposed to be chewing on the stub of an unlit cigar while doing this?

Actually, I've never claimed to be a real mechanic. The fact is, I tend to think up complicated ways of doing simple things. If I were doing it for a living I'd be in trouble.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JV Puleo said:

Isn't he supposed to be chewing on the stub of an unlit cigar while doing this?

Actually, I've never claimed to be a real mechanic. The fact is, I tend to think up complicated ways of doing simple things. If I were doing it for a living I'd be in trouble.

 

Yes, though the cigar should be lit if he's also spraying clear coat at the same time. :)

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made the test vanes today and it occurred to me that I never illustrated this step because I'd left the camera in the office. The vanes are made from  5/16 x 5/8 flat stock. The first step was to make 4 vanes exactly the same length. I did this two pieces at a time with a 5/8 square collet.

 

IMG_1244.thumb.JPG.449408571c4735d123c5d3848900c4f3.JPG

 

After one end is finished square, I used this collet stop to set the depth and a stop on the bed of the lathe to set the tool.

 

IMG_1245.JPG.d39002e651f1efcd3428b6e2c5fc8389.JPG

 

The result is 4 pieces of identical length.

 

IMG_1246.JPG.e684721bff9c6406dd85957e8422641c.JPG

 

Then, because they are too thick, I milled them down to within about .015 of the finished thickness. This was necessary because to get the fit I want the finished size is .258 - slightly more than a 1/4"

 

IMG_1247.thumb.JPG.d2358c3938dbff453caf00c9865a7bc0.JPG

 

Then the finished thickness was arrived at with the surface grinder.

 

IMG_1248.thumb.JPG.f6ddb8550b546933ca2d7b2d0b5cc632.JPG

 

Here is the finished piece in the holding fixture. There is still more to do but I'm getting close.

 

IMG_1249.thumb.JPG.03ecc647107e26a90ebe3a7025ad9d23.JPG

 

I used soft point set screws to hold the vane and not mar the finish. The springs arrived today but I'm still waiting on a couple of 1/8" end mills to get the flat bottom hole but may do an experiment tomorrow with an end mill I have to see if my measurements work.

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tested the fixture this morning and it worked perfectly.

 

IMG_1250.thumb.JPG.07b3363f95b7a9103f0b2fb0b82cbe8e.JPG

 

But...the drill press doesn't run out as much as I'd thought so the 1/8" diameter springs are tight in the 1/8" holes. Since I can't easily make the holes only a few thousandths larger, I've ordered some .120 diameter springs. I'll do another test when they arrive but I am now confident this is going to work.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, when you need a little runout you don't get it and you're not sure if you should be disappointed or proud.  Maybe you could buy a new drill press from your local big box store... you'd be SURE to get some runout... like a lot of runout. ;)

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Luv2Wrench said:

LOL, when you need a little runout you don't get it and you're not sure if you should be disappointed or proud.  Maybe you could buy a new drill press from your local big box store... you'd be SURE to get some runout... like a lot of runout. ;)

 

 

It is funny...if I remember correctly, I rebushed the spindle. Perhaps I should revisit my repairs on this machine. I did them years ago when I was nowhere near as well equipped - or had as much experience as I do now. It is a nice size for fussy work. I'll have to think of a way to get variable speeds - can you put something like a rheostat on a 110 motor? (My knowledge of electricity, aside from wiring 3-phase machines, is almost totally lacking.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, JV Puleo said:

 

It is funny...if I remember correctly, I rebushed the spindle. Perhaps I should revisit my repairs on this machine. I did them years ago when I was nowhere near as well equipped - or had as much experience as I do now. It is a nice size for fussy work. I'll have to think of a way to get variable speeds - can you put something like a rheostat on a 110 motor? (My knowledge of electricity, aside from wiring 3-phase machines, is almost totally lacking.)

 

I think a rheostat will hurt the motor if it does run.  There are, however, single phase VFD (variable frequency drives).  I'm looking to get one for my mill and possibly the lathe as well. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Luv2Wrench said:

 

I think a rheostat will hurt the motor if it does run.  There are, however, single phase VFD (variable frequency drives).  I'm looking to get one for my mill and possibly the lathe as well. 

Yes, VFD is the way  to control an AC motor. Not cheap but the best way. Had a Bridgeport brand vertical miller offered to me with “some” tooling. I didn’t need it,  but couldn’t pass it up for $700. Turns out it’s a variable speed with power feed on the x axis. The tooling included all kind of Starrett instruments, boring heads, fly cutters, expandable reamer sets, right and left hand dies/taps, two vices, etc., etc.. The tooling included was everything they had in two 7’ tall, 36” wide metal cabinets! Told my neighbor he could have it before I even saw it so he agreed to take it. Looking at the value of used tools and accessories, he got over $7,500 worth of stuff for $700. Best thing is I can borrow any of it I need! 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new springs only arrived at the end of the day so I found myself looking for a reasonably short job to do while waiting. I decided to modify the aluminum fan I bought from a fellow forum member. It is too big to go in my lathe so I set it up in the rotary table to mill off the flat belt pulley.

 

IMG_1251.thumb.JPG.625f19b6ed3b721bf46ebc998ebefb7a.JPG

 

It went quite well. This old cast aluminum is full of blowholes but it machines quite easily.

 

IMG_1252.thumb.JPG.93770714129c6af828acc65e4b25a9c8.JPG

 

I only took off about half of the pulley because I wanted to use it to hold the fan while boring the center out. I made a plug that fit the original hole in the center as a centering fixture. Since this is a casting, only the machined surfaces are reliable.

 

IMG_1254.thumb.JPG.7d62ed50d28b88100c9135597e2e3ecb.JPG

 

With it centered, I lowered the table and set up the boring head. All this stuff just fit with very little room to spare.

 

IMG_1255.thumb.JPG.ae488634f8e71f9dbe1d935f222dc3dd.JPG

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bored the fan out to slightly more than 2-1/2". I will make another piece to press into this that will include ball bearings to rotate on and the new fan pulley.

 

IMG_1256.thumb.JPG.5464e09f716c6a5b4c9a28908a1bd127.JPG

 

I would have finished this today but as I was making the last cut my neighbor, from the foundry next door, came in. They have a machine down I took a look at and offered to make the parts needed to get it back in operation. I did set the fan back up in the rotary table. Tomorrow I'll remove the remainder of the flat belt pulley.

 

IMG_1257.thumb.JPG.8a4e13f54a4bce44b094f5fa722b83fa.JPG

 

 

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I finished machining the old fan this morning, taking off the piece of the old pulley that I left to hold it with.

 

IMG_1258.thumb.JPG.333b213ffd2ee06ef2db8452905531e4.JPG

 

IMG_1259.thumb.JPG.fc665069307a04809216c422eb7cadea.JPG

 

I'll now make a piece to press into this that will hold a pair of ball bearings and include the new V belt pulley. Tomorrow I'll revisit the oil pump vanes. The new springs came in last night and fit the holes perfectly so I just need to adjust how deep the holes will be and I can finish the vanes and test the pump again.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe, you may be pleased to hear that I am using the Archdale milling machine a lot more now, thanks to your help with your tips and your excellent posts. I am machining up the clamping parts for the mechanical Wicksteed saw that I purchased. They had been abused and butchered over the years. I am getting more confidence every time I use the mill. The old big lathe is also being used more and seems a lot easier and nicer to use than the Myford I have been using for the last 10 to 15 years. Thanks again for all your help and encouragement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...