Sign in to follow this  
alsancle

Reo Royale

Recommended Posts

F&J    389

Just noticed it has blackwalls.... That is what I said on another thread about something that will subconsciously steal your eye, which prevents seeing the whole thing, as your eye or brain can't wander aimlessly to all the subtle details.

 

 

ok, I'll shut up now :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alsancle    437

Frank,  if it had whitewalls your eyes would have gone to the wheels.  Notice dark on the bottom and top and light in the middle.  Works pretty well.

 

The picture is 1974 in downtown Lansing at a Reo meet.  Although I agree with the background, if I said 1954 I doubt anybody would notice.

 

This is 1967 at Hershey.

ReoRoyaleHershey1967.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alsancle    437

Max Hamilton, the gentleman from WV who owned it for 30s years and is pictured in the previous picture sold it to Alden "Peach" Thomas who was the son of the Chief Engineer at Reo from its inception until around 1933.  He personally saw the car being built and it was quite a dream for him to get the car back.  Max practically gave it to him.  Peach had a superficial restoration done back to what is close to the original colors.   Frank,  where do your eyes go in this picture?

ReoRoyale-Dietrich-1980s..jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, edinmass said:

I like the white walls.........I recommend keeping them. 😃

I tend to be a whitewall fan too (especially double whitewalls) - they are a statement of "keeping up with the Jones', my dog is better than your dog, and .... - ie. they were invented for a reason !  That being said, cars with Chrome Wire Wheels generally look good with blackwalls, as do European cars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
edinmass    274

Big Al and I both think the Reo needs the double wide whites. Great minds can't be wrong...........

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
F&J    389
On ‎5‎/‎7‎/‎2017 at 8:07 AM, alsancle said:

Frank,  where do your eyes go in this picture?

Honestly not sure...because I am totally distracted by the roofline/window height of this side view..... I would have to say that this car has the absolute best roofline of a 4 door closed car that I can think of.  That designer who did the original sketch, found the craftsmen to build it totally as he envisioned .... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
F&J    389
On ‎5‎/‎7‎/‎2017 at 8:07 AM, alsancle said:

Frank,  where do your eyes go in this picture?

 

26 minutes ago, F&J said:

Honestly not sure...because I am totally distracted by the roofline/window height of this side view..... I would have to say that this car has the absolute best roofline of a 4 door closed car that I can think of.  That designer who did the original sketch, found the craftsmen to build it totally as he envisioned .... 

 

On ‎5‎/‎7‎/‎2017 at 0:16 AM, F&J said:

Just noticed it has blackwalls.... That is what I said on another thread about something that will subconsciously steal your eye, which prevents seeing the whole thing, as your eye or brain can't wander aimlessly to all the subtle details.

 

 

Just a wake up call for my own brains thought pattern:   That car is a perfect example how I viewed this particular car, in it's colors and accessories. Rather than being stuck in a box of always concentrating on chassis size, or wheel/tire treatments... My eye did not get distracted by those, I instantly liked the first total view, then I first went to the stunning roofline, then my eye wandered next to the symmetry of the opposing doors which also is a home run, then the ratio of roof height to lower body, etc.

 

The point is only to say, that I assume tires/wheels must not be something that my subconscious tells me to look at first.  Like if you know a guy who is a "boob" guy, his brain is subconsciously pre-programmed by him, and he always checks a woman's chest out first, without really knowing it.... and only then, does his brain allow his eyes to wander.

 

A beautifully designed car should start your brain off fresh, and not instantly see the LWB or hood length etc.. it wanders, not knowing what on earth to focus on first.  If that makes any sense.

Edited by F&J (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alsancle    437

I don't know that Ray Dietrich ever did a bad design.  One of the guys on the forum studies body design (Steve) and he explained that the reason that car looks right.  Hopefully I don't mess it up but 3 things and maybe he can chime in with a better explanation:  1. Note the edge of the radiator sits on the front axle while the back of the roof sits on the back axle.   With your basic sedan, that rear line is always after the rear axle.   2.  The 3,2,1 side light principle.  The front door glass is 50% bigger than the rear door glass which is 100% bigger than the back roof line.  Finally the height of the green house is very low, especially for 1931.

 

The body on this car is set back 4 inches and that extra length is in the cowl which extends the hood.  That doesn't hurt either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
F&J    389

I sometimes might give the impression that I think too much or talk too much... but I wanted to say how I first realized that each person or living creature with eyes, do indeed have uncontrollable eye movements when seeing anything..

 

Decades ago, some entertainment program/TV show, hired some tech crew to set up some sort of laser thing to project a tiny red dot on the exact precise spot that a guys eyes were pointing at.  The point of the test was to try to see if "all guys" went to the "naughty bits", before anything else.

 

The many guys that were tested, got an instant 30 second view of a "standing up" stunning gal in early 20s dressed in tight fitting jeans and top. 

 

The red dot was always jittery, some guys red dot jittered around at the facial area, some back and forth at the boobs, and some back/forth at the crotch level, and apparently also to hip width.  Then "that group" of men were seen to proving that those were the 3 main "first focus" of "most" men, as after some time, then the dot went to waist size, upper thigh, hair type, etc.  These movements were shown to be totally uncontrollable when they later instructed each guy to retest, and not focus on "parts" but to just take in the whole person....but the dot was still all over the place.  Interesting to me, anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
F&J    389

I forgot the most important part of that tests results, that has to do with a person who always scrutinizes something like tires/wheels..

 

The tests on all the guys proved which guy was a boob guy or face guy.  The dot always quickly went to all areas, and never locked in at dead stop, but a face guy always noticeably kept going back to the face after going to hips again, or then waist again etc. The percentage of total time that it went to one spot constantly, showed that each guy had a different preprogrammed and subconscious, focal area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alsancle    437

To play on your metaphor without getting in to trouble,  the first thing I always look at is the roofline and greenhouse height.  You can change the wheels and tires but you can't change that, unless you are chopping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
F&J    389

Last post on that test, .. I promise ..

 

Al's many posts over the years, has given me the impression that tires/wheels and then added doo dads like Trippe lights are his "box", yet he isb truly "gifted" by the fact that he still can see a great car lurking beneath those,..... so that is sort of not being trapped by that obvious box.

 

My new LaSalle taught me that I was totally in a subconscious? box for decades.  Partly as most people cannot have one of everything like Harrah was able to have, so we train ourselves consciously/subconsciously to "prefer" a certain year, era, or a certain marque.  That could be to keep us from never being unhappy with what we can afford, restore, maintain, drive or store?

 

I forced myself consciously to focus only on 1932-ish auto styling for the above reasons.  The LaSalle broke all patterns in that it is the only car I ever fell for, and eventually, totally, but did not like it's looks at all, at first.  I was in a box and did not know it, with 50 years being around vintage cars.  Not just what I bought for myself, but perhaps 200 more for flipping.  We flippers, tend to seek out cars we know the popularity of, or know the market, but we often mess up by buying what we like for some reason, then find out the rest of the world does not want what we prefer.

 

time to go to work today :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this