Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
imported_Badger Guy

1st year the 327 was made

22 posts in this topic

Anyone know what year the 327 was first used? When was the last year it was used? As long as I'm asking, How about the 265 and the 283?

Thanks

Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear BG,1962 was the first year for a 327 in a Corvette and i believe a full size Chevrolet.diz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the 265 was introduced in 1955 and the 283 in 1957.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Chev small block V8 was introduced as a 265 cu in 162HP optional engine for the 1955 models.

It was replaced by the 283 in 1957. Then continued until replaced by the 307 in 1968.

So the 265 ran from 55 to 56 and the 283 from 57 to 67.

The 327 was produced from 1962 to 69.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 265 was also available in '57. It was the standard 2-bbl V8 with manual transmission.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Packard introduced their 327 in late 1947 on the Super Eight. Oh, did you mean that later Chevy thing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the 1/4 mile in 14 sec et, at 150 MPH.

Musta started pullin real hard towards the end

There were also the small and big journal 327s. Until 67, they used the smaller 265/283 crank journals. In 68 the cranks were the larger, 350 sized journals

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Badger Guy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Anyone know what year the 327 was first used? When was the last year it was used? As long as I'm asking, How about the 265 and the 283?

Thanks

Tom </div></div>

The 327 ceased to manufactured after the 1969 model year. The 265 only made it through 1957, but only in stick shift cars in the final year. The 283 lasted until 1967.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who finds 283/327 <span style="font-weight: bold">much</span> more interesting than their 307/350/400 derivatives?

Said it b4, I'll say it agin, a 350 Chevy is the most boring engine on the planet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Said it b4, I'll say it agin, a 350 Chevy is the most boring engine on the planet.

couldn't agree more.

25,000 streetrodders can't be wrong!

well, yes they are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm puzzled. Is the 350 boring because it's so reliable? Or because it seems to be the engine of choice for those thinking that it makes a good old car into a neat old hot rod??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the boring association of the '350' is that it has no ring to it. '327' conjers up more excitement, much like a '396' sounds meaner, and nastier than a '400'. And how about the sell out of the cubic inch displacement towards the metric system. My Yukon has a 5.3 litre V-8, I'd much rather have it called a '327' with the 60's era V-flag emblems on the front fender. Sounds like you are talking about wine containers, not engines. The real painful one to hear these days is the such-and-such litre HEMI, come on America - wake up and take your country back!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Neat old hot rods" should have "neat old engines", like Flatheads, Nailheads, Rockets, Hemis and Cadillacs. Tricked-out 283 and 327 fall into this category too- either of them with injection or 6-pot carburetion has an undeniable cool factor. You may say, "all SBC look alike" and they do, but a 350/400 so equipped <span style="font-style: italic">just ain't cool</span>.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that hot rods need flat heads. I was just curious, as the 350 is such a good engine... as long as it's in a Camaro or a Chevelle, etal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually prefer the 327, the shorter stroke lets her rev up fast!

No matter what you put a 350 Chevy in, it will get 10 MPG.

'74 Impala? 10 MPG

'79 GMC pick up? 9.6 MPG

'74 Nova? 10.6 MPG

Radio Flyer wagon? 10 MPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Camero (the most common, it seems, spelling of the car) got WAY more than that. As I recall, it was closer to 18 on the highway.

My '72 Impala with the 400 got around 12.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the 265 Chevy V8 was introduced for the 1955 model year and was used through 1957 (both V8's were avail in 57, 265 and the 283)

The 283 Chevy V8 was introduced for the 1957 model year and used through 1967

The 327 Chevy V8 was introduced for the 1962 model year and used half way through the 1969 model year only to be replaced by the 307 (talk about a BORING engine, the 307 wins)

the 307 Chevy V8 was around for the 68 through the 73 model years

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the info guy's. I got a 327 out of a 67 Camaro that belonged to my brother. I'm planning to use it in my 60 Impala project. I was just curious as to when the 327 first came out.

Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> No matter what you put a 350 Chevy in, it will get 10 MPG. </div></div>

Ummm, there are 4 350's around my yard. All of them get around 15-16 on a trip. Oh, one's an Olds 350, but it's fuel milage isn't much better. crazy.gif

The 327? Oh, well, it's got more than 2 carbs, can't really compare it to anything else, I guess. laugh.gif

Wayne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure. I know my dad's friend Roger has a '62 Impala SS that has the factory 327 in it. The car has 40,000 miles on it and he's owned it since it was new. I know it would've been after '57, but not sure about '58-'61..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0