Jump to content

Car ID from small picture


gwells

Recommended Posts

It appears to have the GM "B" body used in '39 and '40. None of the other GM cars using that body had a bumper like this car's. Granted, it's necessary to strain hard and use a little imagination to accept that the picture is too fuzzy to reveal the true outline of the lower portion of the grille, which is rectangular. 40 Olds !

Edited by Dave Henderson (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keiser,

Thanks, but I don't think so. Grille on the Olds doesn't match up with the pic I posted. Nor to my eye do the headlights or does the pointed "nose" of the hood.

But my old eyes are getting so bad that you could be right anyway...

There were only a couple of cars with the flared bumper ends in the era...1940 Oldsmobile and 1942 Packard. Plymouth had a similar flare, but I would say that the car in question has all of the features as the 1940 Oldsmobile. Split windshield, running boards, cowl vent and horizontal ridge around the middle of the fenders. I am sticking with the 1940 Oldsmobile identification. I would date the photo no later than 1940.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, thanks for the help, gentlemen.

Just for jollies, here's the complete picture. The Atlanta History Center posted "Looking north from Spring St. and Marietta St. c. 1935" and of course, that dating is cannot be accurate.

If anyone sees something else that will help date this image, please let me know. Wish I had access to a larger copy...

post-40502-143142948816_thumb.jpg

Edited by gwells (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that Chrysler a 41? I know you will be on this like good cookies John!

Third one up from the bottom in the far right lane looks to be a 1940 or 1941 DeSoto sedan with the trim around the taillights going down to the bumper.

Edited by keiser31 (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm guessing that '40 is too new for the Packard, based on it having a luggage rack. I'm not a Packard authority, but oem racks for most cars were almost all gone a few years before that. For example, '37 was the last year they were available for Fords, and few others had them because trunks became integrated into the designs. Ergo, I'm thinking it's a '38 or '39, but not earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm guessing that '40 is too new for the Packard, based on it having a luggage rack. I'm not a Packard authority, but oem racks for most cars were almost all gone a few years before that. For example, '37 was the last year they were available for Fords, and few others had them because trunks became integrated into the designs. Ergo, I'm thinking it's a '38 or '39, but not earlier.

When you Google "1940 Packard photo", a lot of them come up with the luggage rack. They were probably a rare accessory by then, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'35 Ford, '35 Dodge or? Like Manuel my first impression automatically was that it was a Ford, same "fat" fender look the '35's had, as opposed to the leaner looking Dodge's. But a Ford should have one more horizontal grille trim bar showing, and there should be 1 or 2 external horns tucked up closer under the headlights, but there isn't. What there is farther down are probably horn covers which a Dodge would have had there. But, and maybe it's just the photo, the grille looks too wide for a '35 Dodge, and the general impression has that '35 Ford look. .Hmmm, could it be that it's a FORODGE??

The car behind it could be a '37 Pontiac.

Isn't that an American Austin to the left of the "Forodge"?

Edited by Dave Henderson (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...