Jump to content

North Carolina Special Interest Car Legislation!


Recommended Posts

Good Afternoon Fellow Car Owners:

Our House bill H 861 bill is coming up again and will be voted on in House the House Transportation Committee this Wednesday May 6, 2009 at 11 am. We support this bill. Here is the House Transportation Committee member list and links:

LINK

Our bill S820 (the Senate companion to H861) is coming up in the Senate Commerce Committee Thursday May 7, 2009 at 11 am. We support this bill. Here is the Senate Commerce Committee member list and links:

LINK

The NC DMV’s bill attempting to legalize and expand their inspections of our cars plus charge us an inspection fee is S476. It will be heard simultaneously with S820 on May 7, 2009. We oppose the DMV agencies’ own bill, S476.

Please come to the hearings, call and send emails. Many thanks for your assistance.

Jim Lore

919 349 2606 cell

:

Proposed Committee Substitute for HB 861 –FINAL

SECTION 1. G.S. 20-4.01 (43) reads as rewritten:

(43) Specially Constructed Vehicles. – Motor vehicles that may be registered under this Chapter and that fit within one of the following categories.

a. Replica vehicle. – A vehicle, excluding motorcycles, originally sold

unassembled and manufactured from a kit, which when assembled

replicates an earlier year, make, and model vehicle.

b. Street rod vehicle. – A vehicle, excluding motorcycles, manufactured

prior to 1949, which has been modernized from the manufacturer’s original design or has a body constructed from nonoriginal materials and to which the owner seeks a street rod registration classification.

c. Custom vehicle. – A vehicle, excluding motorcycles, manufactured

on or after 1949 which has been modernized from the manufacturer’s original design or has a body constructed from nonoriginal materials and to which the owner seeks a custom vehicle registration classification.

For a vehicle registered under this section, unless the presence of the equipment was specifically required by a statute of this State as a condition of sale in the model year listed on the certificate of title, the presence of any specific equipment is not required for the operation of a vehicle registered under this section. A vehicle registered under this section is exempt from any statute that requires periodic vehicle inspections and from any statute that requires the use and inspection of emission controls.

SECTION 2. Part 3 of Article 3 of Chapter 20 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:

§ 20-53.1. Specially constructed vehicle titles.

(a) Specially constructed vehicles shall be titled in the following manner:

(1) Replica vehicles shall be titled as the year, make, and model of the vehicle intended to be replicated. A label of 'Replica' shall be applied to the title and registration card. All replica vehicle titles shall be branded as 'Specially Constructed Vehicle.'

(2) The model year of a street rod vehicle shall continue to be recognized as

manufacturer's assigned model year. The manufacturer's name shall continue

to be used as the make with a label of 'Street Rod' applied to the title and

registration card. All street rod vehicle titles will be branded as 'Specially

Constructed Vehicle.'

(3) The model year of a custom vehicle shall continue to be recognized as the manufacturer's assigned model year. The manufacturer's name shall continue to be used as the make with the label of 'Custom' applied to the title and registration card. All modified vehicle titles shall be branded as 'Specially Constructed Vehicle.'

SECTION 3. G.S. 20-54 is amended by adding a new subdivision to read:

"(10) For specially constructed vehicles or vehicles originally built by a generally recognized manufacturer, certificates of title and registration shall not be denied or delayed on the grounds that the originating title is from out-of-state, the vehicle is of a certain age, or the vehicle has not been first inspected by a representative of the Division unless there is some probable cause to believe an individual vehicle has some issue particular to it that justifies an inspection before title and registration are issued."

SECTION 4. G.S. 20-70 is amended by adding a new subsection to read:

"© The notification and registration requirements contained in G.S. 20-70 (a) and (B) regarding an engine change shall only be required if the motor vehicle into which a new engine is installed uses an engine number as the sole means to identify the vehicle."

SECTION 5. Sections 1 shall become effective October 1, 2009. Section 2, Section 3 and Section 4 shall become effective upon ratification.”

EXPLANATION OF COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL 861 – DMV TITLING CATEGORIES/ INSPECTIONS- – (REPRESENTATIVE GOODWIN) AND S820 (SENATORS HARTSELL AND BERGER/D)

History of the DMV Created Title /Vehicle Inspection Issue

Prior to January 1, 2008, if you purchased a vehicle manufactured 35 or more years ago with an out-of-state title you could obtain a NC title within the timeframes typical for any other vehicle. If the title number was not in the DMV computer you simply presented a pencil tracing of the vehicle’s Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) and the title would be issued just as any other title. This procedure, which was working smoothly, was changed by the issuance of a January 2, 2008 DMV memorandum to its License and Theft Bureau. Without utilizing the required APA rule-making procedures and without any opportunity for public comment, that memo changed the rules so that all 35 years and older vehicles with out-of-state titles would be subject to a mandatory inspection program prior to title issuance, registration or tags. These rules were further amended by DMV Official Bulletin #206 dated August 13, 2008, once again without going through the mandatory APA ruling making process, to amend their previous rule change and allow these vehicles to qualify for registration and tags, but not a title, without an inspection. These rules ignore NCGS 20-183.2(a1), passed as SB 1083 in 2004 and effective January 1, 2005, which eliminated safety inspections for historic vehicles, defined as vehicles 35 years and older.

Current Problems Resulting From This Change in Titling Procedure by DMV

This unlawfully-initiated DMV inspection program has resulted in unnecessary:

• Delays of weeks or months to obtain NC titles and registration after application because of the time it takes to get an appointment for an inspection and the processing of the paperwork,

• Lost time from work by classic car owners of 1 to 2 days just to go through the new DMV onsite inspection and follow up interview processes at DMV License and Theft Bureau offices,

• Inspections of owner’s paperwork, even including EBay purchase papers,

• Damage to cars that sometimes results from the removal of paint or even the dismantling of the cars by inspectors who have no idea how to handle these rare cars,

• Inspections by DMV inspectors questioning the legitimacy of cars if vehicle part numbers, including those of engines, do not match,

• Questioning of non-material modification including upgraded brakes, suspension modifications, etc., resulting in threats of vehicle title reclassification.

Explanation of the Need for the Bill

This new provision ends the current unwarranted practice by the DMV of making title issuance conditioned on physical inspections of vehicles simply based on age, without any probable cause to believe there is an issue with the particular vehicle in question. DMV inspectors do not have the expertise to make vehicle title classification judgments under the current illusory standard of “material alteration”. Moreover, DMV field inspectors do not have anywhere close to the manpower necessary to perform the current mandatory inspections on a timely basis. Finally, the current policy of DMV, of implementing these new rules without complying with the APA, is in fundamental conflict with the general legislative intent and spirit of G.S. 20-183.2 (a1) and G.S. 20-79.4 (B) (55) which exempt historic vehicles from DMV safety inspection procedures.

More particularly this bill:

• Clarifies that replica cars titled in NC can be titled as the model year they replicate as opposed to the year they were built,

• For vehicles 35 years and older purchased from out-of-state, restricts and for most cases eliminates the current NC DMV practice of delaying the issuance of a NC car title until an employee of the NC Enforcement and Theft Office personally inspects them,

• Restricts and for the most part eliminates the current practice of the NC DMV of questioning the legitimacy of cars that have undergone a simple engine change and eliminates the current DMV practice of requiring these cars to be re-registered,

• Restricts and for the most part eliminates the NC DMV branding of NC car titles based on an individual DMV’s inspector’s opinion about whether a car has been materially modified.

Prepared By:

R. James Lore

Attorney at Law

102 I Commonwealth Court

Cary, N.C. 27511

919 469- 9103

You are also welcome to personally come to Raleigh next week and attend the hearings on these bills.

Jim Lore

919 349 2606 cell

Please note that our email address has changed.

Velda Wall

Asst. to Jim Lore

R. James Lore Attorney at Law

102-I Commonwealth Court

Cary, NC 27511

Phone: (919) 469-9103

Fax: (919) 469-9193

velda@jimlorelaw.com or

jim@jimlorelaw.com

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest News! I'm sorry I'm late with this.

Good Evening:

Here is an update.

This afternoon we were able to get our bill, S820, voted out of the Senate Commerce Committee. It will be heard on the NC Senate floor Wednesday, May 13, 2009 in the afternoon.

The bad news is that the DMV agency bill, S476, also was voted out of committee. It is also going to be heard on the Senate floor tomorrow afternoon. As you will recall S476 legalizes the universal DMV inspection by Enforcement and Theft officers of all cars 35 years or older bought from out state. (The DMV has already started inspecting these cars bought within NC.) S476 also allows the State of NC to tax you for the labor you put into restoring your own car or a subcontractor you hire puts into your car.

We again need your help. Here is how you can identify your Senator, contact him or her, and help us pass S820 and stop S476 from passing tomorrow.

Go to this website and type in your zip code along with your 4 digit zip code extension number in the right hand bottom window: http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/ Then call the General Assembly’s main switch board operator and ask to be transferred to your Senator’s office. Tell them who you are, where you live, and that you support S820 and oppose S476 which is the DMV agency bill.

Please pass this information on to other car owners. If we win this vote we most likely will win the whole battle in the Legislature.

Jim Lore

919 349 2606 cell

-----

Good Morning:

Our Bill, S820, is up head to head with DMV’s own bill, S476, in the Morning at 11 am, May 11, 2009 in the Senate Commerce Committee. This is the critical vote in the Senate. This is one of your last chances to help us by pilling on. We need some car owners to come to Raleigh for this committee vote.

Jim Lore

91 349 2606 cell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy, Burgess- we just thought the Vajenya legislature was good at onerous old car legislation.

Our friend Mr. Marshall is going to have another fight for his political life on his hands this year. A former Danville Mayor has announced his candidacy for 14th District House seat. I do not know Seward Anderson as well as I do Adam Tomer, but I intend to have a little friendly conversation with him soon, to see where he stands on old cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The General Assembly website shows that S820 Passed 2nd Reading in the Senate today.

The General Assembly website also shows that S476 was re-referred to the Finance Committee yesterday as originally scheduled if approved by the Commerce Committee.

So, I guess S820 got the nod today, but I am still not quite sure if S476 is going to rear its ugly head again or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Unfortunately the S820 that came out of the commitee was a committee adopted substitute that contains some of th language of Senate Bill 476. The House Transportation Committee will hear S820 on Wednesday,

That bill's text can be found here:

http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2009/Bills/Senate/PDF/S820v3.pdf

If you wish to lobby the House Transportation Committee against the DMV Inspections, the list of the Committee members is located here:

House Transportation Committee members

You can click on the representative's names to get their contact information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...