Results 1 to 22 of 22
General Discussion Discuss Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods. in the AACA GENERAL DISCUSSION forums; There is a new law in Ma. that will probally stop Hotroders from buying nice antique cars and hodroding them. If interested, follow this thread on The Hamb. (of interest ...
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Mass.
    Posts
    1,169

    Question Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    There is a new law in Ma. that will probally stop Hotroders from buying nice antique cars and hodroding them.

    If interested, follow this thread on The Hamb. (of interest to anyone with a customized car or specially built car.)


    http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/s...d.php?t=683183

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,590

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    While your bias is obvious (and in which case, why are you reading H.A.M.B.?), the thread sounds more like a state attempting to collect more revenue by further restricting the use of antique plates. Big surprise, in today's economic environment that's going on everywhere. As a former MA resident, we called it "Taxachusetts" for a reason. I also see plain stupidity on the part of government employees (imagine that!) since when I lived there, cars more than ten years old did not get titles. Apparently some DVM employees aren't old enough to remember that or the fact that VINs weren't always 17 characters long.
    Joe Padavano
    OCA Capital City Rockets chapter

    62 F-85 Deluxe wagon
    64 Jetstar 88
    66 442 conv
    68 W-30
    69 H/O
    69 442
    70 W-30
    72 442
    78 El Camino
    84 Custom Cruiser
    86 Caprice wagon (w/307 Olds)
    93 Allante

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,114

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Having a '95 Chevy with a older body registered as a 95 Chevy doesn't really sound that unfair, even if motivated by revenue. Registering pre-VIN cars on engine number is a long established practice

  4. #4
    Senior Member trimacar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Winchester Va.
    Posts
    2,950

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Well, interesting how different people can read different things.

    The way I read both the thread and the law:

    -Massachusetts doesn't want a "built" hot rod titled or licensed as an original antique automobile

    -Massachusetts wants a "built" car to be safe, and thus must have some inspection of components to assure it's not a death trap for driver or others

    -Massachusetts wants to assure that stolen parts aren't used on a "built" car

    Doesn't sound unreasonable to me, compared to the standards that car manufacturers have to meet to put a "built" car on the road......
    David Coco
    Antique Car Upholstery
    Leather interiors - 1900 through the 30's
    Tops for wood bow automobiles
    540-5332885
    David.Coco@comcast.net
    Winchester Va.
    1910 Model 20 Hupmobile
    1910 Buick Model 16
    1910 Hudson
    1931 Chevrolet tudor
    1931 Pierce Arrow Model 43 phaeton
    1937 Cord standard phaeton
    1938 Packard Super 8 convertible coupe
    1953 Chevrolet 5 window pickup
    1967 Lincoln Continental convertible
    1969 Cutlass convertible
    1971 Pontiac Firebird Esprit

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    50

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Investing both time and $ building any car before investigating state, federal or import laws doesn't make good sense to me.

  6. #6
    Senior Member avgwarhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    943
    Images
    10

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Quote Originally Posted by mike brady View Post
    Investing both time and $ building any car before investigating state, federal or import laws doesn't make good sense to me.
    Can't argue that logic.
    Chris Gossweiler
    1954 Buick Special 48D. It is a 264 and nothing more.
    BCA#-46800
    I adore my 54!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    357

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Quote Originally Posted by trimacar View Post
    The way I read both the thread and the law:

    -Massachusetts doesn't want a "built" hot rod titled or licensed as an original antique automobile
    I never have understood the logic of registering a hot rod as an antique. The only thing antique is usually the body (or at times just a few parts of the body). All modern running gear and interior, usually. But in this case, a "built" hot rod using all reproduction materials ( a fiberglass or new body, etc.?), would make even less sense as an antique.

    And if the purpose of a hot rod or modifed is driveability (and an assumption that they will be driven more than antique licensing allows...), then that is another issue.
    Last edited by 36chev; March 28th, 2012 at 20:17.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Decatur IL
    Posts
    1,723

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Quote Originally Posted by trimacar View Post
    Well, interesting how different people can read different things.

    The way I read both the thread and the law:

    -Massachusetts doesn't want a "built" hot rod titled or licensed as an original antique automobile

    -Massachusetts wants a "built" car to be safe, and thus must have some inspection of components to assure it's not a death trap for driver or others

    -Massachusetts wants to assure that stolen parts aren't used on a "built" car

    Doesn't sound unreasonable to me, compared to the standards that car manufacturers have to meet to put a "built" car on the road......
    Assuming for a moment that it is not just a money grab it sounds like someone saw a carelessly built rat rod and decided to crack down. I had been waiting for that to happen. Todd C

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    El Paso, TX
    Posts
    1,429

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    In Texas, hot rods are not supposed to be registered as Antiques, but a lot of them are. There doesn't seem to be any inforcement, and given the unusual nature of historical vehicle registrations, I makes sence as to why. I am surprised I have not been stopped for not having an inspection sticker, not required of course, but would the average cop know?
    1929 Chrysler 65 roadster restored, 1930 Nash Twin Ignition 8 Cabrolet, unrestored, 1942 Packard Super 8 convertible under restoration
    1942 Packard Super 8 160 138" wb unrestored, 1942 Packard Super 8 Darrin project, 1946 Packard pick up project with Packard White engine
    1947 Bentley 2 dr custom, 1950 DeSoto woody restoration, 1970 Triumph TR250 (MC)HPOF, 1976 Mercedes 450 SL, 1982 Lincoln Continental

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Southside Vajenya
    Posts
    4,860

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Quote Originally Posted by 36chev View Post
    I never have understood the logic of registering a hot rod as an antique.

    Generally financial or trying to get the car out of safety and emission inspections.
    Glenn Williamson
    AACA Life Member
    Member of all major Olds clubs

  11. #11
    Administrator R W Burgess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Millers Tavern, Va.
    Posts
    10,772
    Images
    8009

    Re: Possible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Before you guys continue bashing hot rods and their licensing problems, be aware that those cars and our antiques are generally in the same boat. We need them, they need us, as a unified front to protect our hobby. I'm not supporting the build quality of either, just keep the message above in mind!

    Wayne

  12. #12
    Senior Member Steve_Mack_CT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    2,036

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Wayne, this is where it gets tricky. I guess it is a decision of the value of the numbers vs. other issues. Forget the philisophical differences, and I recognize many collectors have both vehicles in their garage - good for them. (Would love a traditional '32, a "short list car" for me! )

    The issue I have with being in the same boat is not personal, but it relates to:

    Above comments about these not being true antiques seems valid to me. Modern running gear or radically modified, essentially home built vehicles are not "historic vehicles" Agree with safety and tax concerns outlined above. It is just a case of appropriate regs for the situation, not an "anti hot rodder sentiment" in my view.

    More critical to me though, is that the fact of the matter is some of these guys (not all, but some) misbehave on the road. Within the last 3 years, deaths involving fatalities in CT alone attributed to antique cars have turned out to be hot rods NOT antiques - but it is a reflection on the hobby. For the record, one I believe involved a health or mechanical issue and no other cars, two involved a high rate of speed - this is the concern. If the media and subsequently the public views this as typical "antique car behavior" that cannot be good for preventing further PITA legislation, etc.

    BUT how do you educate on the difference in a changing culture as has been discussed elsewhere many times including recently. Maybe we do need the numbers after all, as you say.

    This is a tough choice, I think...
    Last edited by Steve_Mack_CT; March 29th, 2012 at 09:16. Reason: clarity
    Steve
    1989 Mercedes Benz 560 SL
    AACA, CCR-AACA, & MBCA

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    6,723
    Images
    1

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    I see nothing gained by the school girl mentality of making light of others misfortune. From 20 feet most "Joe Adverage "guys can't tell a restored 1932 Ford from a full fendered Hot Rod. Bob

  14. #14
    Senior Member trimacar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Winchester Va.
    Posts
    2,950

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Steve, I agree with you, and as much of a purist as I am, also wish I had a traditional duece roadster, after seeing some period cars in California it's hard not to like them.

    I don't see this as bashing hot rods, but rather, doing what is right and within the law. A hot rod should be licensed as a regular car, not an antique, unless the State involved has a special hot rod license plate (and it seems that I've seen those).

    A perosn with a rod shouldn't try to take advantage of the antique license plate laws, and the end result of doing so may well affect the laws that apply to us "original" guys and gals....That's the concern.........

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Mass.
    Posts
    1,169

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    In Ma., there is absolutely no reason to register a hot rod as an antique, just the opposite, there are legal limitations as when and where you may drive it as an antique.
    If one were to register it with Classic car insurance, with regular plates, the costs would be the same, and the driving limitations are less.

  16. #16
    Senior Member avgwarhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    943
    Images
    10

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Marylands requirements:

    To be registered as a historic vehicle (class L), your vehicle must be 20 calendar years old or older and must not have been substantially altered, remodeled or remanufactured.

    A historic registered vehicle cannot be used for general daily transportation, or primarily for the transportation of passengers or property on highways. It can only be used in exhibitions, club activities, parades, tours, occasional transportation and similar uses. A motor home, tow truck, or trailer does not qualify for historic registration.

    If your historic vehicle is 60 years old or older, you may obtain a permanent, non-transferable registration for a one-time fee.

    You can apply to register your vehicle as a historic vehicle in person at any of the MVA’s full service branch offices. You also can mail the required documents to the MVA’s Mail in Registration Unit in the Glen Burnie office, or go to an MVA licensed tag and title service where they will assist you in applying. Licensed tag and title services will charge a fee for this service.

    The registration application documents include:

    Application form – When your vehicle has a Maryland title and you are registering and titling it at the same time, the title can be used as the application form for both transactions. If the vehicle’s title was issued by another state, use the Application for Certificate of Title to apply. If you have already titled the vehicle in Maryland and now want to register it, you will need to complete the Application for New Plates/Stickers & Transfer of Plates or Non-Title Trailers.
    Application for Historic or Street Rod Registration
    Under certain circumstances, additional information and/or forms may be required:

    Application for the Use of Vintage Registration Plates – If you possess vintage (old) license plates that are dated the same year as your vehicle’s model year, you may apply to display these vintage license plates on the vehicle, in place of the historic tags that are usually displayed. However, the historic tags will still be issued and must be carried in the vehicle at all times. There is a one-time fee for the use of vintage tags.
    Specialty license plate application form – Historic vehicles are also eligible to display personalized message (vanity) plates. If you choose to request these plates, see Registration – Specialty License Plates for details. Historic vehicles 60 years or older, with permanent registration, do not qualify for special registration plates.
    Note: A Maryland Safety Inspection Certificate is not required to register this vehicle.

    How do I register a vehicle as a street rod?

    To be registered as a street rod (class N), your vehicle must:

    be 25 model years old or older; and
    have been substantially altered from the manufacturer’s original design.
    A vehicle registered as a street rod cannot be used for general daily transportation, or primarily for the transportation of passengers or property on highways. It can only be used in exhibitions, club activities, parades, tours, occasional transportation and similar uses.

    You can apply to register your vehicle as a street rod in person at any of the MVA’s full service branch offices. You also can mail the required documents to the MVA’s Mail in Registration Unit in the Glen Burnie office, or go to an MVA licensed tag and title service where they will assist you in applying. Licensed tag and title services will charge a fee for this service.

    The registration application documents include:

    Application form – When your vehicle has a Maryland title and you are registering and titling it at the same time, the title can be used as the application form for both transactions. If the vehicle’s title was issued by another state, use the Application for Certificate of Title to apply. If you have already titled the vehicle in Maryland and now want to register it, you will need to complete the Application for New Plates/Stickers & Transfer of Plates or Non-Title Trailers.
    Application for Historic or Street Rod Registration.
    Under certain circumstances, additional information and/or forms may be required:

    Application for the Use of Vintage Registration Plates – If you possess vintage (old) license plates that are dated the same year as your vehicle’s model year, you may apply to display these vintage license plates on the vehicle, in place of the street rod tags that are usually displayed. However, the street rod tags will still be issued and must be carried in the vehicle at all times. There is a one-time fee for the use of vintage tags.
    Specialty license plate application form – Street rods are also eligible to display personalized message (vanity) plates. If you choose to request these plates, see Registration – Specialty License Plates for details.
    Note: A Maryland Safety Inspection Certificate is not required to register this vehicle.
    Chris Gossweiler
    1954 Buick Special 48D. It is a 264 and nothing more.
    BCA#-46800
    I adore my 54!

  17. #17
    Senior Member trimacar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Winchester Va.
    Posts
    2,950

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    So, taking Maryland as an example, if you register as either an antique or a street rod, it can't be used (legally) for regular transportation.

    Thus, if someone builds a daily driver "rod" out of a vehicle 25 years or more old, the only way to drive it regularly would be to register it as a regular vehicle.

    The irony in this, and any state's legislatation, is that there's no clause for a "period correct" hot rod. Let's say you buy a little duece coupe, and it was built in 1948. Then, it still goes under the terms of a substantially altered car. There almost needs to be a "historic hot rod" category.....

  18. #18
    Senior Member avgwarhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    943
    Images
    10

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Quote Originally Posted by trimacar View Post
    So, taking Maryland as an example, if you register as either an antique or a street rod, it can't be used (legally) for regular transportation.

    Thus, if someone builds a daily driver "rod" out of a vehicle 25 years or more old, the only way to drive it regularly would be to register it as a regular vehicle.

    The irony in this, and any state's legislatation, is that there's no clause for a "period correct" hot rod. Let's say you buy a little duece coupe, and it was built in 1948. Then, it still goes under the terms of a substantially altered car. There almost needs to be a "historic hot rod" category.....
    IMO there needs to be only two. The vehicles need to be 25 years old. If the car is substantially altered it is a hot rod no matter the year manufactured. If the car is untouched and as original as it can be it is historic no matter what year manufactured. If other catefories are presented soon it will a laundry list of items for cars to fall under and a muddled mess. We have enough muddled mess already concerning the DMV.
    Chris Gossweiler
    1954 Buick Special 48D. It is a 264 and nothing more.
    BCA#-46800
    I adore my 54!

  19. #19
    Senior Member trimacar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Winchester Va.
    Posts
    2,950

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Yes, I think I agree, it's already a mess, adding more categories would just confuse it more.

    Soon after moving from Louisiana to Virginia, I bought some NOS 1937 Virginia license plates to go on my Cord. Went to DMV, had to get my license renewed. They pulled up my license, and "female" was marked on the sex line. Somehow we figured out that was a mistake. It took the DMV attendant 90 minutes to change my sex, during which time she had to call the main Richmond office three times.

    Finally, sex was changed (whew!), and I handed her the plates, TH-xxxx. Um, Mr. Coco, she said, we can't put Truck for Hire plates on a passenger car. What! I exclaimed...You make me go through a 90 minute operation to have my sex changed, and now you won't let me use these plates!?!?!

    She smiled and said what the heck, and registered them. That's why my 1937 Cord phaeton is a truck for hire.....with a passenger car (antique YOM) registration...
    David Coco
    Antique Car Upholstery
    Leather interiors - 1900 through the 30's
    Tops for wood bow automobiles
    540-5332885
    David.Coco@comcast.net
    Winchester Va.
    1910 Model 20 Hupmobile
    1910 Buick Model 16
    1910 Hudson
    1931 Chevrolet tudor
    1931 Pierce Arrow Model 43 phaeton
    1937 Cord standard phaeton
    1938 Packard Super 8 convertible coupe
    1953 Chevrolet 5 window pickup
    1967 Lincoln Continental convertible
    1969 Cutlass convertible
    1971 Pontiac Firebird Esprit

  20. #20
    Senior Member avgwarhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    943
    Images
    10

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Clearly the DMV needs some cleaning up in some areas. By and large my visit to register and tag my Buick was under 1 hours. I was pleased. Our laws in MD concerning historic vehicles is being examined because a lot are abusing the tag system for historic vehicles. In short, pulling the old Ford Taurus from the weeds. Claiming it's historic. Getting tags cheaply. Insurance coverage even more cheaply than the tags. NO INSPECTION NEEDED. Cars are now daily drivers. Clearly abusive. Some of the "historic" are absolute beaters and dangerous. But, the state says thats ok. However, daily driver is not ok. I see the same "historic" beaters going on the same road same time everyday. Rattling and smoking. MD should really require inspections and full charge on tags. This will keep the "historic" beater off the road.
    Chris Gossweiler
    1954 Buick Special 48D. It is a 264 and nothing more.
    BCA#-46800
    I adore my 54!

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Dayton Ohio
    Posts
    919
    Images
    4

    Re: Oossible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    I have no problem seeing a hotrod registered as a antique as long as it is not a reproduction built with all new parts,those should be registered as a regular vehicle but as the year it resembles.

  22. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Just a mile off the highway
    Posts
    86

    Re: Possible good news for purests, bad news for hotrods.

    Quote Originally Posted by R W Burgess View Post
    Before you guys continue bashing hot rods and their licensing problems, be aware that those cars and our antiques are generally in the same boat. We need them, they need us, as a unified front to protect our hobby. I'm not supporting the build quality of either, just keep the message above in mind!

    Wayne

    Furthermore, sometimes rodders can be helpful in the type of items they are reproducing (which are often not available elsewhere)

    Sheet Metal Replacement Parts: Buick, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, LaSalle,32 Ford. Kemps

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bad news / Good news! Paint: No. Wheels: Yes
    By bepnewt in forum Buick Riviera - Riviera Owners Association
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 30th, 2011, 09:59
  2. Bad news good news
    By G Froelich in forum Buick Reatta
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: April 19th, 2010, 18:18
  3. Good news (L67) Bad news (Totalled 98 Riviera)
    By imported_55chevy in forum Buick Reatta
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: January 5th, 2006, 20:50
  4. ABS ..Good News
    By Barney Eaton in forum Buick Reatta
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 2nd, 2001, 01:28

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •